The elephant in the living room
#2
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:13 AM
#3
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:19 AM
Even the Cable Company provided DVRs are crap compared to a TiVO.
I have had a series 2 TiVO for 3+ years and would not trade it for anything currently on the market.
Yeah it is not perfect but until Apple comes up with a features list comparable/equal to TiVO calling the Apple TV a TiVO Killer is laughable and makes this article a good candidate for being called link-bait
#4
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:26 AM
If the Apple TV 3.0 would include an HD tuner and DVR, I would be one of the first to buy one. But then again, I doubt I am the typical consumer since a vast majority of Americans have cable or satellite. While I might hope for this feature, I am not expecting Apple to offer access to HD content over the air while trying to sell some of the same TV shows through iTunes for a fee. The two services (iTunes and over the air HD) are not completely compatible from a profit-oriented perspective. Just like my Sony DVR, it is great for consumers but bad for business.
#5
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:26 AM
I have an AppleTV. I find it to be very useful to me, but a lot of that is because I have all my DVDs ripped so that I can watch them whenever I want. Everyone that sees it is impressed, but the software that makes it possible (Handbrake) isn't even included with it.
Renting from the iTunes store via the TV interface is very cool, but I never rented before I had the AppleTV, and I have a hard time with the idea of buying movies from the Apple store when one crashed hard drive means I lose the movie forever (Apple doesn't let you re-download purchased content).
I'd love to see DVR capability, but unfortunately it's a pain in the current market. You have to support DirectTV, Dish Network, analog cable, and digital cable. Yuck.
#6
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:27 AM
I couldn't agree more.
#7
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:28 AM
Also, I think it is absolutely asinine of TiVO to force its users to view ads when it charges $12/month for its DVR service in addition to the cost of equipment.
#8
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:33 AM
I've tried messing with UPnP solutions like MediaLink, but they're still slow and error prone, even aside from the fact that they don't work with iTunes Store content.
#9
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:35 AM
#10
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:35 AM
It will be up to some enterprising third party company to come up with a software/hardware "fix" to bring this functionality to the Apple TV--if it can be done.
#11
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:41 AM
#12
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:47 AM
Hi,
for me, I'm quite happy to schedule, record, and edit shows on my Mac using EyeTV. I love the idea of AppleTV even in its current form, but will only buy when and if it supports 1080p (or even 1080i) and divx playback.
Until then, I use a 1080i capable UPnP player, or hook up my Macbook to my HD TV when I need it. I am considering buying a dedicated Mac Mini (which would let me schedule and record with EyeTV right on the TV) but I am holding off until Apple updates the Mini, as it is long overdue.
Cheers,
Graham.
#13
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:48 AM
>I don't like watching commercials as much as the next guy but this is how American television works.
Actually that's how it works in many other places, too. US Americans seem to think, for example, that all programming in the United Kingdom is commercial-free (possibly because our "public tv" stations often purchase BBC programming. But the BBC isn't the only thing they watch over there, folks. They've got commercial programming just like the rest of us.
Now I don't mind a few commercials, but some networks (here in the USA now) really do butcher up their programming to increase the advertising. 115 minute movies taking 3 hour blocks of airtime!!! And the ad-skipping technology is but one of several reasons so many networks have begun placing the ads DURING the programs. I'm sure I'm not the only one who has been annoyed by bouncing, swirling, animated adverts in the lower corner of the picture.
And so, because of the extensive interruptions and during-program advertising on US TV, I finally just gave up. Yes, I got rid of my television all together, a couple years ago. (I occasionally rent a movie and watch it on my computer, and sometimes rent or buy serial TV programming--but thus avoid that advertising.) So I'm now one of those who doesn't give a rats whisker whethere a TiVO can skip ads or not. Or whether Apple has an iTV or not. I do not watch TV at all. And you know what? I get a full night's sleep now, and my groggy coworkers can't understand why I'm so alert and cheerful. :)
#14
Posted 14 July 2008 - 09:56 AM
In order for a DVR to really work right for everyone, it has to play nice with the user's cable, DirectTV, Dish, whatever... Does TiVo offer a single device that works well with all of the options? Limiting as it may be, a DVR just works better when it is also your cable/satellite box. I have a USB tuner with DVR software and it works OK with my basic cable, but can't tune the digital channels, including all of the HD stuff. It can work with an HD antenna, but who wants to put an antenna on the roof and still not have the cable channels in HD?
But, all of this is besides the point. AppleTV is not a DVR. It has no inputs, so without becoming a totally different product, it won't happen. AppleTV isn't supposed to enhance your current TV viewing... it is supposed to add to it or (for some) replace it. It is meant to be a vehicle for iTunes TV show and movie sales. Apple knew that as cool as it is to take video with you, no one really wants to watch everything on a 3.5" or smaller screen. AppleTV gets iTunes into the living room and has some other bells and whistles to boot like photo viewing from .Mac/MobileMe and Flickr and YouTube videos. People just need to stop expecting a product to do something it wasn't meant to. My pliers doesn't make a very good hammer, so I should go complain to Craftsman?
Help










