Review: ClamXav 1.1
#2
Posted 28 July 2008 - 04:28 AM
#3
Posted 28 July 2008 - 05:01 AM
2- Macs will not be virus free for ever...
#4
Posted 28 July 2008 - 05:20 AM
Manusnake said:
They can look after themselves. Why would I spend my money and slow down my computer to protect those that chose an insecure platform?
Quote
Virus software you buy today won't be able to detect viruses released tomorrow. And when there is a legitimate Mac virus out in the wild, the press will be all over it. Then I'll make my decision on whether or not virus detection software is available.
#5
Posted 28 July 2008 - 05:54 AM
#6
Posted 28 July 2008 - 06:06 AM
1. MS office macros?
2. All known Mac trojans?
3. All known Mac rootkits?
Thanks
#7
Posted 28 July 2008 - 06:35 AM
#8
Posted 28 July 2008 - 06:49 AM
#9
Posted 28 July 2008 - 06:54 AM
Because if you forward along an attachment, say for business, and it has some kind of Windows virus, they won't open it. They will cower in fear because their anti-virus software has alerted them that you are trying to infect them.
So you can crow all you want about our superior, more secure platform... but if it impedes my ability to do business with the rest of the world, I'll check out ClamAV, thankyouverymuch.
#10
Posted 28 July 2008 - 07:24 AM
They can look after themselves. Why would I spend my money and slow down my computer to
protect those that chose an insecure platform?
{quote}
You seem to be a very selfish person, with limited angle of vision. There are people out there who cannot afford a Mac because it's too expensive, or get one (even if they can afford one) because of their geographic location. So, are you going to tell these people: "Sucks to be you. Your mother should have gone to a different country to give birth? Or sucks to be you, you should have been born richer?"
You also seem to forget that many people have a mixture of both Mac and Windows computers at home. I happen to be in that situation, and therefore don't want to put my Windows computers at risk.
If a Mac virus comes to life one day, the effect will be more catastrophic than a similar virus on the Windows platform, because a lot of Mac users think they are invincible.
#11
Posted 28 July 2008 - 07:47 AM
#12
Posted 28 July 2008 - 12:57 PM
This is a really good utility, although I admit to only running it intermittently to flush out any Windows junk that has accumulated on my MacBook. Long may it remain so.
#13
Posted 31 July 2008 - 08:24 AM
For those who think that Macs are invincible, I'll try to explain my opinion with this analogy... just because our army is the best technologically and quality of our soldiers, that doesn't mean our goverment should stop developing better weapons and security measures to put in place to protect us. Because we are not directly under attack now, that doesn't mean we will never be. The enemy is always looking for ways to hurt us and that means looking for deficiencies in our defense as well as developing new weapons. Just imagine if we don't stay ahead of the game a get caught unguarded. History has always proved that be worry is way better than to be sorry.
The same principle applies to Mac computers. Just because Macs are not under attack now from hackers and other criminals doesn't mean they are not looking for ways to do it.
#14
Posted 01 August 2008 - 04:33 AM
The same principle applies to Mac computers. Just because Macs are not under attack now from hackers and other criminals doesn't mean they are not looking for ways to do it. {quote}
Vey well done, and very good analogy. I'm a Mac user myself, but sometimes I am baffled by the attitude of some Mac users thinking that Mac's are invincible. For example, I once asked someone on an unsecured wireless network if he had his firewall enabled. His answer was: "No, but I'm on a Mac anyway." If firewall was not important at all, why would Apple include it in the OS?
Help












