Review: Bento 2
#15
Posted 15 October 2008 - 01:24 PM
I have many extensive Filemaker databases. It would be unthinkable to recreate them manually in another program.
Peter Wesly
#17
Posted 15 October 2008 - 02:29 PM
No upgrade price for 1.0 users is pretty poor. The 1.0 release was pretty limited and the early adopters really help drive the development of 2.0 which appears to be much more functional - in essence what the 1.0 should of been. Now it $100 for a dB application with a solid level of functionality. Like I said pretty poor support for your 1.0 adopters.
To be honest the 2.0 should be FREE to anyone that purchased the 1.0 product. They are the early adopters. They are the ones that helped improve the product. They are the ones that evangelized the product. You have screwed them. Now they will screw you. Yes new features have been added in 2.0 but if you believe that 1.0 was a mature product then your kidding yourself.
#18
Posted 15 October 2008 - 05:34 PM
A lot of what is lacking in Bento 2 (security, cross-network/internet collaboration) is already available in the Google Docs spreadsheet, in just as usable a form. If Google creates a link between Google docs, Gmail, and desktop databases on the Mac, as they have enabled with iCal & Google calendar, then we'll never see Bento 3!
#19
Posted 15 October 2008 - 06:41 PM
XML files drive a lot of the content of my website. They are currently generated from Excel but the Mac version of Excel doesn't have that capability... do that I now looking for a different way to handle this XML files generation.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Bernard
#20
Posted 15 October 2008 - 07:40 PM
Version 2 is much expanded and has better migration/importation capabilities (from existing products) so I may give it a whirl...if I can pick it up for half price again. But it's not worth $49 to me since I already have existing solutions which perform similar functions in a perfectly acceptable fashion.
#21
Posted 15 October 2008 - 07:51 PM
"FileMaker is pleased to announce the release of Bento 2. As a recent purchaser of Bento 1 personal database software, you are eligible to receive Bento 2 via download, for free!"
#22
Posted 15 October 2008 - 11:35 PM
I don't care what OTHER companies do, for a product that, in its first version, was little more than a glorified Beta, it cost too much and didn't do enough. To force that same price on a product that just might pass for decent is ridiculous. I'd be willing to pay for an upgrade price, but the product hasn't even been out that long! And what about free updates for the interim, fixing outstanding issues? This is absolute BS, and they won't be getting any more of my money.
#23
Posted 16 October 2008 - 05:41 AM
Where are the bug fixes for version 1? Oh, that's right there in version 2 which you must pay for. Certainly, if they'd of said, "oh, by the way, we aren't going to fix the bugs in the program except for ones that are catastrophic data bugs," a number of people would not have even tried the program.
This is a major customer service blunder on the part of FM.
#24
Posted 16 October 2008 - 06:38 AM
FileMaker will obsolete your version in less than 9 months. Then your data is trapped in abandonware and some day an OSX update will break it and there will be no patch. By by data.
If you have data in Bento1.0 or Bento2.0. Dump it to CSV as soon as possible and learn to use the free database product on OpenOffice3 (now a native Mac app).
At first I thought Bento was worth it (good UI and connivence is worth something). But FileMaker is so actively hostile to its customers you must defend yourself from them and get your data out while you can. You will waste far less time doing this now than it will cost to do it after you are a version behind, un-patched and un-runnable.
#26
Posted 16 October 2008 - 01:11 PM
The whole point everyone's been making is that we shelled out $49 for something that was barely a beta, and the FileMaker people expect us to pay $49 for bug-fixes and minor patches-- not even a complete program overhaul or new features? It's simply not worth it. There should have been free bug-fixes and patches in the interim between v1 and v2, but we got NONE. And in v2, some of the more critical and highly-suggested features (no matter what FM's website touts) have yet to be added, still leaving the program crippled.
#28
Posted 16 October 2008 - 05:55 PM
Thanks. Joel.



Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote