Jason Snell said:
Quite frankly, I don't think digging up innuendo about the personal health of Apple's CEO is our job. So we don't do it.
We don't report on rumor because rumors are incredibly unreliable, and I don't believe they serve anyone's best interests. Even the best rumor sources are often totally wrong, because Apple continually changes its plans.
We're not here to feed the next episode of a soap opera, one about Steve Jobs' health or one about what the next imaginary rumored product might be.
And this, Jason, is why a keep coming back to MacWorld.
The other day a friend of mine asked me if I believed in extra terrestrial intelligence and UFO's. I responded that the day an article exposing uncontroversial hard evidence to this matter was to be published in the National Geographic Magazine, I would start believing. As far as Mac news goes, I feel the same way about MacWorld.
Something that hasn't been commented is all these articles generate buzz, and I don't mean for Apple. We all know that as of lately, they got all the attention they need. I allude to all these sudo-journalist/blogger types that can't even check the veracity of a source, and they simply echo the opinion of others, whether it adheres to reality or not.
That Dan Lyons guy to me is among the worst. You can easily spot his disdain for Jobs. This guy has never been anybody until he became the Fake Steve Jobs, now that he has given that up, he is back to being a nobody and he does not like it too much. These types jump at the opportunity to garner attention for them selves, I find it quite pathetic.
Message was edited by: Grapho