Kazoo said:
It will fail with Pirates of the Caribbean 3 and Wall-E.
Posted 06 February 2009 - 07:33 AM
dean_o said:
Posted 06 February 2009 - 07:44 AM
Wondercow said:
Posted 06 February 2009 - 07:50 AM
MacKayaker said:
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:06 AM
webraider said:
Quote
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:10 AM
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:17 AM
trusswalker said:
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:23 AM
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:24 AM
MacKayaker said:
Bottom line - I think most of my protest to this kind of article and discussion is a practical one.
I'll grant that there are legitimate reasons one may want to create a back-up of media they have legitimately purchased - for their own use. And I have no real issue with that. I tend to buy CDs, as it makes that, for myself, far easier - and I like the extra info that comes with a CD versus a digital version of the same album.
Thanks for the more measured response and the recognition that there are legitimate reasons to rip from media we own. My iPod is filled with music that I have ripped from CDs that I own. My reason for doing that rather than buying from iTunes is several-fold. First, I have a very high-end audio system at home (Rotel CD player, Hafler amp, VMPS speakers, etc.) and I want uncompressed music for that.
It's funny that you should mention "extra info", but that is one of my primary reasons for liking MP3s. In my car, I have an Alpine head unit that can play music from my iPod, displaying album cover, song title, artist name, etc. I can search by album, artist, or track name. That's all missing digitally on the original CD. Add to that the ability to control the encoding quality, selecting something which is sonically superior to online purchased tracks, and it's the best choice for me.
MacKayaker said:
As a practical matter, interacting with computer users day-in and day-out - I see this kind of info used for piracy. I see pirated software. I get queries on how to copy content borrowed, rented, etc. and what works for legitimate intentions - also works for illegitimate. I have users who have iTunes libraries that are messed up - and full of songs ripped from library CDs, etc. Since I observe far more illegitimate, I see it as not too wise to publically declare how to do this kind of thing.
This is where you and I may have to just agree to disagree. I do not want to see us reach a point where we self-censor, harming legitimate users in order to protect corporations.
It's one thing to choose not to publish information on how to produce (the deadly poison) Ricin, but quite another to withold information about extracting movies from DVDs and audio from CDs.
Sorry, but Disney's and Microsoft's interests are not more important to me than the interests of the users who purchase their products.
You say "as a practical matter" and I'll respond in that vein. Consumers have everything from iPods with video (I have an iPod classic 120GB) to laptops that can play multimedia files extracted from DVDs. The quickest way to run down your laptop's battery is to play optical discs -- and that's a big concern on long flights. It's also a good way to wear out your expensive laptop optical drive as you bounce across the country in a jet while the head assembly tries to follow a track that is about 1/50th the width of a human hair. As airlines impose ever greater fees and restrictions on checked bags, consumers are looking for ways to minimize what they carry. When a consumer can put his movie collection on his laptop drive or iPod, that's a tremendous boost to his quality of life while travelling. Maybe the fact that I've been on a launch campaign for a satellite since mid-November (three months now), spent four months on one last year, and six months the year before, makes me more sensitive to this than you may be.
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:29 AM
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:34 AM
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:43 AM
Posted 06 February 2009 - 08:47 AM