Macworld Forums: ATI Radeon HD 4870 Graphics Upgrade for Mac Pro now priced - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ATI Radeon HD 4870 Graphics Upgrade for Mac Pro now priced

#1 User is offline   Macworld Icon

  • Story Poster
  • Icon
  • Group: MW Bot
  • Posts: 12,851
  • Joined: 30-November 07

Posted 05 March 2009 - 10:07 AM

Post your comments for ATI Radeon HD 4870 Graphics Upgrade for Mac Pro now priced here
0

#2 User is offline   HyperMactive Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 83
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 05 March 2009 - 10:50 AM

$349 is a "slight premium" over $200? Isn't that, you know, nearly double?
0

#3 User is offline   ChrisLJ Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 440
  • Joined: 26-May 08

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:07 AM

I always find it interesting to check out the comparable video cards for PCs when Apple announces something like this.
Although these versions of the HD4870 have two DVI ports and no mini DisplayPort, they are available for under $200.
http://www.newegg.co...eon%20HD%204870
0

#4 User is offline   DogHouseDub Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 97
  • Joined: 26-January 05

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:17 AM

Mass production versus limited run...it's all about volume, right?
0

#5 User is offline   HyperMactive Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 83
  • Joined: 07-June 05

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:31 AM

And here I thought when Apple joined the rest of the world with the same graphic card connectors and Intel-based motherboards that we'd just be able to pick up a standard-issue video card off the shelf, plug it in, and go. Silly me. Nope, we still have Mac versions of these cards that come with a hearty price increase. Lame.
0

#6 User is offline   oigres1973 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 05-March 09

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:36 AM

Wow. Do you even know the difference between LED and LCD?
0

#7 User is offline   Peter Cohen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,646
  • Joined: 05-February 03

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:37 AM

HyperMactive said:

And here I thought when Apple joined the rest of the world with the same graphic card connectors and Intel-based motherboards that we'd just be able to pick up a standard-issue video card off the shelf, plug it in, and go.


Well, you thought wrong.
0

#8 User is offline   oigres1973 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 05-March 09

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:37 AM

Macs use LEDs instead of LCDs?
0

#9 User is offline   Peter Cohen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,646
  • Joined: 05-February 03

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:39 AM

ChrisLJ said:

Although these versions of the HD4870 have two DVI ports and no mini DisplayPort, they are available for under $200.


They're also not manufactured by Apple.

Yes, Apple makes its own video cards -- well, more to the point, it has them manufactured by a subcontractor, much in the same way that it has all of its computers made -- but the point remains the same. Apple isn't able to provide the same economy of scale that other manufacturers will, so the price is higher.
0

#10 User is offline   JBucanek Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 05-June 06

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:51 AM

HyperMactive said:

$349 is a "slight premium" over $200? Isn't that, you know, nearly double?


The $200 Build-to-Order cost is the difference between the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 and the ATI Radeon HD 4870 in the base configuration. When you add the ATI card, they take out the NVIDIA card. So the cost of getting an ATI card in a new MacPro = (cost of NVIDIA GeForce GT 120)+$200.

Apple apparently charges about $150 for each NVIDIA card, so the cost of the ATI in a new MacPro BTO is $350. So it looks like ordering it separately would actually save you $1.
0

#11 User is offline   ChrisLJ Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 440
  • Joined: 26-May 08

Posted 05 March 2009 - 11:54 AM

From the logos on the video card, I would say they are actually made by ATI, and not subcontracted by Apple.
ATI licenses to other card makers and also manufactures their own brand, where nVidia only licenses to other companies. Of course, ATI could sub out their own cards too, I don't know.

I understand economy of scale, but I do think Apple charges excessive prices for their components. They usually have video cards that are darn near obsolete for idiotic prices. It seems like I remember I couple of years ago there was talk about making graphics cards only needing different drivers to run on Macs or PCs.
0

#12 User is offline   Peter Cohen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,646
  • Joined: 05-February 03

Posted 05 March 2009 - 12:27 PM

ChrisLJ said:

From the logos on the video card, I would say they are actually made by ATI, and not subcontracted by Apple.


You'd be wrong.
0

#13 User is offline   Peter Cohen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,646
  • Joined: 05-February 03

Posted 05 March 2009 - 12:30 PM

oigres1973 said:

Macs use LEDs instead of LCDs?


The 24-inch LED Cinema Display certainly does, yes. www.apple.com/displays/
0

#14 User is offline   michaelbirdtx Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 16-June 08

Posted 05 March 2009 - 12:44 PM

Actually, it's an LCD display with an LED backlight, as opposed to an LCD with a fluorescent backlight.
0

  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users