Page 1 of 1
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000
#6
Posted 29 May 2009 - 06:59 PM
I'd like Macworld to do a review of Panasonic DMC FT1 which has similar features to the Tough 8000.
However, the Pana has AVCHD Lite movie format which I heard that iMovie doesn't support.
I'm very interested in this one, and would like to know how it will be reviewed and how it's going to work with Mac users.
However, the Pana has AVCHD Lite movie format which I heard that iMovie doesn't support.
I'm very interested in this one, and would like to know how it will be reviewed and how it's going to work with Mac users.
#9
Posted 01 June 2009 - 06:22 AM
Picture quality? I have the earlier version and it takes the worst pictures of any digital camera I have ever owned, and I have quite a few of them. The scene selector choices is the worst performing as well. Washed out colors, out of focus images, abysmal color artifacts have placed this model of Olympus as the absolute most abysmal digital camera I have ever owned. Numerous attempts to communicate with Olympus have been completely ignored. many REVIEWERS spend ten minutes with a camera and RARELY base their reviews on any serious use of the camera. I would say buyer beware. Search for REAL WORLD WORKING reviews of this camera before you buy. Macworld rarely tests any item it reviews in any real world sense.This review is no exception. It is just a quick (and useless) look at some new toy. In my view.
#10
Posted 03 July 2009 - 06:27 AM
I got this camera after two Ixuses had quit working in the sand and salt mist of this tropical island.
Having read the reviews, I was expecting much worse picture quality that this camera offers.
True, the periscopic lens is prone to flare. True, low/light photos are noisy. Ixus handling and picture quality are superior. But the other side of the story is that you can actually jump into hte waves with this camera, you can take it to the flying sand of the dunes. You can drop it and forget it in you tool bag and it comes out immaculate.
Just rinse it under running water.
If you want the all the manual controls possible and like to peek at the pixels, get something else. If you want a hiking or canyoning partner, here!
No regrets after 8 months of ownership.
Having read the reviews, I was expecting much worse picture quality that this camera offers.
True, the periscopic lens is prone to flare. True, low/light photos are noisy. Ixus handling and picture quality are superior. But the other side of the story is that you can actually jump into hte waves with this camera, you can take it to the flying sand of the dunes. You can drop it and forget it in you tool bag and it comes out immaculate.
Just rinse it under running water.
If you want the all the manual controls possible and like to peek at the pixels, get something else. If you want a hiking or canyoning partner, here!
No regrets after 8 months of ownership.
#13
Posted 19 July 2009 - 11:23 AM
According to the recent underwater camera group test at dpreview.com, this Oly?s image quality was substantially below the group leaders.
The Pentax Optio W60 was the best direct competitor of the tested group; the Canon D10 was the best overall and is waterproof to 10m (32 ft), however at 2 inches thick it may not be a true direct competitor. The Panasonic TS1 was not tested because of availability, but might possibly be a standout when it is finally tested (and if that crazy video codec Panasonic is pushing will work on a Mac).
The Pentax Optio W60 was the best direct competitor of the tested group; the Canon D10 was the best overall and is waterproof to 10m (32 ft), however at 2 inches thick it may not be a true direct competitor. The Panasonic TS1 was not tested because of availability, but might possibly be a standout when it is finally tested (and if that crazy video codec Panasonic is pushing will work on a Mac).
#14
Posted 20 July 2009 - 04:53 AM
Page 1 of 1



Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote