mdawson said:
Yes, but why stop the rebuttals now, just because you already know that his particular brand of numbskullery has no foundation in reality? At the very least, he gives some of us slightly more intelligent users in the forum a good reason to do some googling on various interesting topics... I'm sure that I never would have bothered to read Wikipedia's fascinating entry for "troll", if not for jman's ramblings in another thread. ;)
Quote
In that case, you'll probably also enjoy my (only somewhat tongue-in-cheek) interpretation of the Wikipedia entry for the word "shill". Quoted in part: "Shilling is illegal in many circumstances..." such as when the shill places "...uninformed parties at a risk of loss... ." So if jman actually manages to convince an "Uninformed Party" to buy a Psystar hackintosh, and then Psystar ends up having to collect a fine from that Party, then theoretically jman could be held personally culpable for the loss sustained by that Party. (I think a good lawyer might even argue that this applies even if jman doesn't actually work for Psystar.)
So by all means, jman: keep right on shilling... and let us know how that works out for you. ;)
(Wait for it... here comes his angry rebuttal........)



Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote