When your phone rings, the copyright police may come calling
#17
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:26 AM
Well, they're already making garages pay these fee's for the 'public performance' of playing the radio loud enough for more than one person to hear it.
And they're trying to make a stable pay for playing classical music performances to horses.
Nothing is too crazy for these guys.
And they're trying to make a stable pay for playing classical music performances to horses.
Nothing is too crazy for these guys.
#22
Posted 02 July 2009 - 12:45 PM
Looks like someone wants to dethrone the RIAA as the king idiots of the music industry. This easily beats the RIAA's long-standing attempt to claim that when you buy a copy of a musical performance the license applies to the combination of content and medium.
Would this also apply to singing in public? I remember several years ago walking through Newark in the spring and there was a guy doing a phenomenal rendition of "I can see clearly now." Dead-on Otis Redding impression.
Would this also apply to singing in public? I remember several years ago walking through Newark in the spring and there was a guy doing a phenomenal rendition of "I can see clearly now." Dead-on Otis Redding impression.
#23
Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:40 PM
Both ASCAP & BMI have made utter buffoons of themselves with their lawsuits:
* Suing a girlscout troupe for singing The Macarena without paying royalties
* Suing a luncheonette owner for playing his radio where customers could hear the re-broadcast music (hence another performance) without paying royalties
* Suing coffeehouse-size venues for not paying royalties to the industry associations for musicians performing their own music (since if we paid it directly to the performer ASCAP/BMI would not get their cut)...
These associations only protect the rights & earnings of major artists, media distributors and theit investors. The royalties that most artists I know receive through them barely pay the annual fees. Direct online/at-show sales & distribution is where many are going and simply cut out the strong-arm squads.
So, yes DogHouseDub - you do owe royalties for sporting a boombox in public... according to ASCAP/BMI.
* Suing a girlscout troupe for singing The Macarena without paying royalties
* Suing a luncheonette owner for playing his radio where customers could hear the re-broadcast music (hence another performance) without paying royalties
* Suing coffeehouse-size venues for not paying royalties to the industry associations for musicians performing their own music (since if we paid it directly to the performer ASCAP/BMI would not get their cut)...
These associations only protect the rights & earnings of major artists, media distributors and theit investors. The royalties that most artists I know receive through them barely pay the annual fees. Direct online/at-show sales & distribution is where many are going and simply cut out the strong-arm squads.
So, yes DogHouseDub - you do owe royalties for sporting a boombox in public... according to ASCAP/BMI.
#24
Posted 02 July 2009 - 03:03 PM
This has been the best laugh of the day. Are you sure it isn't April Fool's Day.
I hope the judge can stop laughing long enough to hear motions.
People please make sure to mute your phone, during court or you are liable to not only be in contempt of court but owe royalties.
I hope the judge can stop laughing long enough to hear motions.
People please make sure to mute your phone, during court or you are liable to not only be in contempt of court but owe royalties.



Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote