Macworld Forums: When your phone rings, the copyright police may come calling - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

When your phone rings, the copyright police may come calling

#15 User is offline   rab777hp Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 1,840
  • Joined: 11-June 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:25 AM

No more iPods! You silly iPod users shouldn't be listening to music in public places!
0

#16 User is offline   alansky Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 838
  • Joined: 14-July 04

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:25 AM

This has got to be one of the most absurd claims I have ever heard. Greed and stupidity know no bounds!
0

#17 User is offline   reallycrazy Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 134
  • Joined: 29-December 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:26 AM

Well, they're already making garages pay these fee's for the 'public performance' of playing the radio loud enough for more than one person to hear it.
And they're trying to make a stable pay for playing classical music performances to horses.
Nothing is too crazy for these guys.
0

#18 User is offline   mc4o1993 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 13-September 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:40 AM

yeah. the first thing I think when I hear one is.. "don't answer that, I want to hear the rest of the song."
0

#19 User is offline   mayhem6 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 07-April 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:42 AM

Here, here! I think they are getting free advertising all the time, so why wouldn't they pay us for playing their music?
0

#20 User is offline   rab777hp Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 1,840
  • Joined: 11-June 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:43 AM

and i'm totally going to wait in public for people to play 15 seconds of a song when they get called instead of buying it.
0

#21 User is offline   bonesb Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 182
  • Joined: 12-September 01

Posted 02 July 2009 - 12:01 PM

It'll be interesting to see how the RIAA can prove the phone wasn't on vibrate at the time of a call...
0

#22 User is offline   bastion Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,804
  • Joined: 14-October 04

Posted 02 July 2009 - 12:45 PM

Looks like someone wants to dethrone the RIAA as the king idiots of the music industry. This easily beats the RIAA's long-standing attempt to claim that when you buy a copy of a musical performance the license applies to the combination of content and medium.

Would this also apply to singing in public? I remember several years ago walking through Newark in the spring and there was a guy doing a phenomenal rendition of "I can see clearly now." Dead-on Otis Redding impression.
0

#23 User is offline   NotarySojac Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 06-May 04

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:40 PM

Both ASCAP & BMI have made utter buffoons of themselves with their lawsuits:
* Suing a girlscout troupe for singing The Macarena without paying royalties
* Suing a luncheonette owner for playing his radio where customers could hear the re-broadcast music (hence another performance) without paying royalties
* Suing coffeehouse-size venues for not paying royalties to the industry associations for musicians performing their own music (since if we paid it directly to the performer ASCAP/BMI would not get their cut)...

These associations only protect the rights & earnings of major artists, media distributors and theit investors. The royalties that most artists I know receive through them barely pay the annual fees. Direct online/at-show sales & distribution is where many are going and simply cut out the strong-arm squads.

So, yes DogHouseDub - you do owe royalties for sporting a boombox in public... according to ASCAP/BMI.
0

#24 User is online   CVBruce Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: 30-December 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 03:03 PM

This has been the best laugh of the day. Are you sure it isn't April Fool's Day.
I hope the judge can stop laughing long enough to hear motions.
People please make sure to mute your phone, during court or you are liable to not only be in contempt of court but owe royalties.
0

#25 User is offline   Mac007 Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 238
  • Joined: 17-August 01

Posted 02 July 2009 - 04:17 PM

I'd like to see them collect the fees. Enforcement would be impossible.
0

#26 User is offline   heisetax Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 741
  • Joined: 02-October 03

Posted 03 July 2009 - 08:43 PM

That's probably the reason they are only going after the cell phone companies. A big enough target to have something to win or to steal.
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users