Macworld Forums: HuffingtonPost.com for iPhone - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

HuffingtonPost.com for iPhone

#1 User is offline   Macworld Icon

  • Story Poster
  • Icon
  • Group: MW Bot
  • Posts: 12,768
  • Joined: 30-November 07

Posted 03 July 2009 - 07:50 AM

Post your comments for HuffingtonPost.com for iPhone here
0

#2 User is offline   snowyowl Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 27-September 05

Posted 03 July 2009 - 08:09 AM

Yes, the design/execution of abundant content is pretty awful with font sizes being out of control. So like dealing with the NYTimes slowness, having a home screen button for quick Safari access is useful too . But HuffPo is nowhere near as bad as the Rachel Maddow app in terms of bad design really getting in the way of interesting thought!
BTW, with a 3Gs phone now, the NYT app is cool -- speed-wise.
0

#3 User is offline   vfx2k4 Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 360
  • Joined: 29-September 04

Posted 03 July 2009 - 10:44 AM

I can't view their mobile site on my old Blackberry either- always crashes horribly. Their coders suck...
0

#4 User is offline   sigzero Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12
  • Joined: 06-July 07

Posted 03 July 2009 - 05:36 PM

Why would I waste space on my iPhone for that crap?
0

#5 User is offline   Chris Breen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3,908
  • Joined: 11-December 00

Posted 03 July 2009 - 08:17 PM

sigzero said:

Why would I waste space on my iPhone for that crap?


Before we get into a battle over the site's content, let's stick to the topic of whether or not the app is a good way for those who care to, to access that content.

#6 User is offline   JakeB Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 131
  • Joined: 12-September 06

Posted 04 July 2009 - 01:54 AM

I was wondering how long it would take some backwoods buffoon to politicize this review.

Congratulations, Sigzero.

Why even bother to attack an app you've never used, which accesses content from a website you clearly have no interest in?
0

#7 User is offline   thebiggfrogg Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 132
  • Joined: 15-June 05

Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:21 AM

I can report that the HuffPo appears to be on the radar overseas as well as it is blocked in China: both the website and the iPod Touch app. I spent several frustrating hours baffled as to why it wouldn't work on the iPod (two different updates) until I finally realized that the website itself is blocked.
0

#8 User is offline   strangemax Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 11-May 06

Posted 05 July 2009 - 06:13 AM

Macworld you're ruining you're credibility by posting political stories. This story goes beyond reviewing an app to praising huffpo. I for one have had enough and I'm voting you off my favorites bar.
0

#9 User is offline   Chris Breen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3,908
  • Joined: 11-December 00

Posted 05 July 2009 - 08:31 AM

strangemax said:

Macworld you're ruining you're credibility by posting political stories.


Again (and for the last time) this is a review of an app not a political story. If you want to talk about the app, great. If you have a problem with the Huffington Post, talk to the people who run it rather than posting your objections here. (And yes, the same rules would apply for a review of Fox News or Rush Limbaugh app.)

#10 User is offline   flybynight Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 886
  • Joined: 21-July 06

Posted 06 July 2009 - 06:50 AM

Sorry, but with lines like "...programming glitch or nefarious Republican plot?" and comparison to Drudge (a site I just can't read because it's so ugly), this is not just a review of the app, but a plug for the site. That's fine, just don't act all high and mighty of your journalistic integrity when the inevitable counterpoint rears its head.
0

#11 User is offline   Chris Breen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3,908
  • Joined: 11-December 00

Posted 06 July 2009 - 07:21 AM

flybynight said:

Sorry, but with lines like "...programming glitch or nefarious Republican plot?" and comparison to Drudge (a site I just can't read because it's so ugly), this is not just a review of the app, but a plug for the site.


The former is a little something we call "humor" in our land. And the Drudge comparison appears to be nothing more than a comparison of traffic.

I think you'd have to look pretty hard to find any plugs for the site in this almost entirely negative review of the app.

#12 User is offline   flybynight Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 886
  • Joined: 21-July 06

Posted 06 July 2009 - 10:25 AM

Yes, I understand that it's humor. I didn't think the author seriously suspected a "nefarious Republican plot." Traffic = popularity... and many would consider that a statement of superiority. OK, if you insist, I'll admit that I could just be reading into that.
I guess my point is more this: you cannot seriously expect to have an article about something that is politically charged to not have opinionated comments. Just as you say... "the same rules would apply for a review of Fox News or Rush Limbaugh app." You would get the same kind of comments from the other side. It just comes with the territory.
0

#13 User is offline   Chris Breen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 3,908
  • Joined: 11-December 00

Posted 06 July 2009 - 10:36 AM

flybynight said:


>You would get the same kind of comments from the other side. It just comes with the territory.

I hold out hope that people can rise above such partisan attacks. Where they can't, we remind them just as strenuously to address the content of the story rather than grind a particular political axe. There are so many better places to do that.

In this specific case, the Huffington Post is a popular destination and, like it or not, is one of the few media outlets attracting money rather than losing it. For these reasons it's an app worthy of our attention. It's too bad it's not a better one.

#14 User is offline   thebiggfrogg Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 132
  • Joined: 15-June 05

Posted 06 July 2009 - 03:05 PM

Just wait until you review the Al-Jazeera app! ; )
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

7 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users