Macworld Forums

Macworld Forums: InDesign CS5 - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

InDesign CS5

#1 User is offline   Macworld 

  • Story Poster
  • Group: MW Bot
  • Posts: 31,652
  • Joined: 30-November 07

Posted 12 May 2010 - 04:31 AM

Post your comments for InDesign CS5 here
0

#2 User is offline   lister 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 101
  • Joined: 30-December 09

Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:27 AM

Wow. Unless you are really, really into creating Flash files in your page layout program (like, wtf Adobe), there is NOTHING compelling in this upgrade. Sure, multiple sizes of documents in one file is nice, and the column spanning. But that's it??

All this bloat to accommodate interactivity that is better done in other elements of CS5. What a waste of time and energy. CS6 anyone?

Skip.
0

#3 User is offline   Nanosound 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 62
  • Joined: 14-December 07

Posted 12 May 2010 - 11:36 AM

I think the whole Flash option is a big mistake. And Flash is becoming a little more like ID with its text tools. It's one way to add features but it does blur the lines a bit.

As far as upgrading the suite, and unfortunately, Dreamweaver has no core support for CSS3/html5 so I will pass on InDesign along with it.
0

#4 User is offline   BarryF.Keaveney 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13
  • Joined: 05-August 10

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:17 AM

Will to work with the iPad...and iPhone?
0

#5 User is offline   cpoff 

  • web guy
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 1,264
  • Joined: 25-March 05

Posted 05 August 2010 - 09:24 AM

View PostBarryF.Keaveney, on 05 August 2010 - 09:17 AM, said:

Will to work with the iPad...and iPhone?


From the review: "OS compatibility: Mac OS X 10.5.7, 10.6"

So no. It won't.

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users