Mac mini (Mid 2010)
#2
Posted 23 June 2010 - 11:37 AM
There is also a 2.66 GHz option available.
#3
Posted 23 June 2010 - 11:58 AM
jgarden, on 23 June 2010 - 11:37 AM, said:
There is also a 2.66 GHz option available.
That's really a BTO option, not a standard config.
Executive editor, Macworld
#4
Posted 23 June 2010 - 12:13 PM
jgarden, on 23 June 2010 - 11:37 AM, said:
There is also a 2.66 GHz option available.
There's only one non-server model, although there is a build-to-order processor-upgrade option. Updated to clarify.
#5
Posted 23 June 2010 - 12:54 PM
#6
Posted 23 June 2010 - 01:21 PM
Make the price less competitive and produce a product that is like the curate's egg: good in parts, bad in parts.
As ever it leaves me looking at it and going "Wha…?"
I can see its potential, something Apple keeps skirting around with creeping progress. Apple needs to get serious, drop the AppleTV and make the Mac mini a full on Entertainment Centre without restricting file usage and being able to easily grab and manage free to air material. Free content/time management is the only thing that would compensate for the unrealistic price.
As it stands it has only one desirable feature. It is small. The offsets of over the top pricing and functional shortcomings are too big to over-rule the cuteness factor in my book.
This post has been edited by Biallystock: 23 June 2010 - 01:22 PM
#7
Posted 23 June 2010 - 02:43 PM
#8
Posted 23 June 2010 - 08:05 PM
#9
Posted 23 June 2010 - 11:56 PM
Apple is asking 799 euros for the simple model.
That's about 985 in US dollars :-)
Check out the Dutch store, for example:
http://store.apple.c...family/mac_mini
I'd love to upgrade, as I own the early 2009 model, but the price they're asking just makes me laugh. And cry a bit, too.
#10
Posted 24 June 2010 - 05:55 AM
YOu're paying for a tiny compact yet quite powerful computer at a normal Apple markup.
Don't want it? Get something else. Otherwise pay up.
This post has been edited by trip1ex: 24 June 2010 - 05:56 AM
#11
Posted 24 June 2010 - 01:13 PM
#12
Posted 24 June 2010 - 01:31 PM
Macworld, on 23 June 2010 - 11:26 AM, said:
Wouldn't it be more accurate to compare the 2010 Mac mini with the faster 2.66GHz processor to the upgraded 2009 Mac mini with the 2.53GHz Core 2 Duo, since they both represent the top available processors on the machine for their two respective years?
Also, would the new mini with either the standard 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo or the 2.66GHz processor, and the 5400 rpm hard drive be suitable for working with QuarkXpress and Photoshop Elements? I recognize I'd need at least 4GB of RAM with either configuration.
#13
Posted 24 August 2010 - 04:57 AM
2.66ghz core dual
8 gb of ram
500gb HD serial ATA
Superdrive 8x
UPS says it is now in Louisville KY (3 days now)
Supposed to be in Toronto today for delivery tomorrow to me.
Can't wait to test the HDMI direct connection to my 32" Panasonic LCD TV.
I have a black MacBook,and connected it to the TV and got a decent picture,(finder and all).
But I had to go from the Mini video out thru a DVI adapter,then another DVI to HDMI adapter.
I will be using my 22"Samsung LCD monitor most of the time for other work than video.
The main reason I bought this unit is for portability with power inside.
Help













