Macworld Forums

Macworld Forums: Beatlemania! iTunes and the hype machine - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Beatlemania! iTunes and the hype machine

#1 User is offline   Macworld 

  • Story Poster
  • Group: MW Bot
  • Posts: 31,666
  • Joined: 30-November 07

Posted 16 November 2010 - 05:37 PM

Post your comments for Beatlemania! iTunes and the hype machine here
0

#2 User is offline   matthewmiller1234 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 138
  • Joined: 23-October 08

Posted 16 November 2010 - 05:45 PM

Wasn't this a little early considering it's only Tuesday instead of Wednesday? Who cares, this is one of the best podcasts available for iDevices from iTunes.
0

#3 User is offline   Chris Breen 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 5,924
  • Joined: 11-December 00

Posted 16 November 2010 - 05:48 PM

View Postmatthewmiller1234, on 16 November 2010 - 05:45 PM, said:

Wasn't this a little early considering it's only Tuesday instead of Wednesday? Who cares, this is one of the best podcasts available for iDevices from iTunes.


Thanks. You're right, we normally post podcasts on Wednesday, but for special events we post 'em as warranted.

#4 User is offline   Macnutjohn 

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,011
  • Joined: 07-December 09

Posted 16 November 2010 - 07:30 PM

I just think the whole thing is a bit anticlimactic at this point in time. People have waited so long for this, that now it's, "so what".
0

#5 User is offline   garyi 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 422
  • Joined: 03-June 05

Posted 16 November 2010 - 11:06 PM

The beatles music is so popular and so in the public hearts and minds that its practically publicly owned.

To offer it in crap quality downloads and for the price they want is madness. No doubt they have whipped up enough enthusiasm that the thing will be worth while. But those that like the beatles will have this music already. Its just silly talk.

If it had been offered in 24/96 hi res or something that would be different. All they have done is offered it in lower the usual quality.
0

#6 User is offline   danw12321 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 50
  • Joined: 09-November 09

Posted 17 November 2010 - 06:34 AM

Beatles? MW Podcast? Sign me up.
0

#7 User is offline   bernardlanguillier 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 27-December 07

Posted 17 November 2010 - 01:36 PM

So there would still be people out there who do not own yet the full Beattles collection as LPs, CDs, SACDs, Blue Rays and various local rips? :)

Cheers,
Bernard
0

#8 User is offline   swampfox 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 09-September 10

Posted 17 November 2010 - 02:38 PM

I am curious if Apple Computer's deal to get the Beatles on iTunes has also given them the rights to other artists who recorded on Apple Records, most notably, Badfinger. A great band whose "original" first 4 albums are not on iTunes, and should be. Anyone?
0

#9 User is offline   Chris Breen 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 5,924
  • Joined: 11-December 00

Posted 17 November 2010 - 02:43 PM

View Postswampfox, on 17 November 2010 - 02:38 PM, said:

I am curious if Apple Computer's deal to get the Beatles on iTunes has also given them the rights to other artists who recorded on Apple Records, most notably, Badfinger. A great band whose "original" first 4 albums are not on iTunes, and should be. Anyone?


Hmm, I seem to recall Steve Jobs saying in regard to Badfinger, "If you want it, here it is, come and get it. But you'd better hurry cuz it's going fast."

Perhaps you're too late.

#10 User is offline   MacKeeperFanBlase 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 90
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 17 November 2010 - 03:02 PM

Bla, bla, bla. Nobody cares on these news which smells like mold old junk. It will be just curious if somebody buy this.
MacKeeper - confidence and security for your Mac!
0

#11 User is offline   Chris Breen 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 5,924
  • Joined: 11-December 00

Posted 17 November 2010 - 03:08 PM

View PostMacKeeperFanBlase, on 17 November 2010 - 03:02 PM, said:

Bla, bla, bla. Nobody cares on these news which smells like mold old junk. It will be just curious if somebody buy this.


Check the iTunes albums charts. Clearly someone does care about this.

#12 User is offline   John__B 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 300
  • Joined: 09-March 08

Posted 17 November 2010 - 07:19 PM

View PostMacnutjohn, on 16 November 2010 - 07:30 PM, said:

I just think the whole thing is a bit anticlimactic at this point in time. People have waited so long for this, that now it's, "so what".


Yeah, you'd think so, but head over to iTunes and look at the top album sales right now:

http://itunes.apple....4&id=1&popId=11

6. Abbey Road
8. The Beatles (White Album)
9. Sgt. Pepper's
10. The Beatles 67-70 (Blue Album)
11. The Beatles Box Set (13 albums + the two Past Masters volumes)
13. The Beatles 62-66 (Red Album)
15. Rubber Soul
19. Revolver
20. Magical Mystery Tour
23. Let It Be
25. Hard Day's Night
etc.

For singles, 66 of the top 200 songs (one third) are Beatles tracks.

Clearly, compared to guys like me who bought all the CDs (Rubber Soul to Past Masters) when they were released in 1987 and then re-bought last year's remasters, there must be millions of casual fans who are buying these because it's convenient or because they wanted to just pick and choose specific tracks. In fact, I would've guessed that the singles sales would be off the charts but it's the albums that really surprised me, esp. the Beatles Box Set for $149 at #11!
0

#13 User is offline   ErnieHinojosa 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 18-November 10

Posted 18 November 2010 - 05:11 AM

As has been stated, to most people for whom the Beatles collection is a must-have, they already have. Seriously. Apparently someone is buying this music at present, as the charts would indicate, but I thought this announcement was going to be something significant. This is over-hype in my opinion. Much ado about very little. Now I think I'll go listen to Rubber Soul, which has been in my digital collection for many years now...
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users