Dropbox 1.0.10
#2
Posted 24 December 2010 - 07:10 AM
#3
Posted 24 December 2010 - 07:18 AM
If and when iDisk ever comes up to this level of quality, I'll go back, but for now, iDisk is only being used as a place for Backup.app to store data.
#4
Posted 24 December 2010 - 07:39 AM
#5
Posted 24 December 2010 - 07:54 AM
But it does have one frustrating deficiency for many of us. It apparently doesn't work quite right with OS X packages, which means it can't be used to synch projects created by that wonderful writer's tool, Scrivener. There's an extensive discussion of the problem here:
http://www.literatur....php?f=2&t=5295
Dropbox is so popular with Scrivener users, the 2.0 version was designed to work around the problem by synching with Dropbox-shared text files created in other apps. But there also seems to be some uncertainty as to why two can't be friends. Dropbox claimed that the problem lay with Mac metadata (now fixed) but Scrivener's support person says:
"This Dropbox report is in error. Scrivener uses no such hidden meta-data files, in fact it couldn't. The format is perfectly 1:1 compatible with the Windows version, which is completely oblivious to Mac meta-data."
I know Scrivener is popular at MacWorld. Perhaps someone there would like to play Geek Detective and track down just what the problem is and what could be done to fix it or work around it.
#6
Posted 24 December 2010 - 10:21 AM
This post has been edited by cpoff: 15 February 2011 - 07:12 PM
#7
Posted 24 December 2010 - 10:40 AM
#8
Posted 24 December 2010 - 12:08 PM
Macnutjohn, on 24 December 2010 - 10:40 AM, said:
I'm not sure if you misunderstand how Dropbox works or if I'm misunderstanding what you're saying here, but your files are all stored locally on each machine with a Dropbox account. They are copied via the cloud, and copies of those files remain in the cloud to sync to any computers not connected to the internet when new files are saved (and to provide backups to restore in case of problems), but the files you use and work with will all be on your machine itself.
#9
Posted 24 December 2010 - 12:31 PM
Dropbox is noticeable faster and 100% reliable (thus far). I've reached the point where it's a part of my Aperture>Photoshop>Dropbox workflow. If Dropbox was part of .me it'd be a killer combo (er, maybe not, Apple would screw it up). However, this year I am ponying up for Dropbox. Steve keeps hinting that .me is going to get better but, after 3 years and around $300 waiting for that to happen, I get the feeling he's in no hurry.
Dropbox is a true no-brainer for me.
#10
Posted 24 December 2010 - 10:25 PM
Has anyone used both to compare how well they work?
#11
Posted 25 December 2010 - 05:24 AM
The only other comment I have is that I've tried to synchronize things like my Safari bookmarks and iTunes configuration stuff across my computers and have encountered some difficulty. These programs often require files stored in specific locations (not in the Dropbox folder) and some high-level creativity involving both hard and soft unix links is required. Said differently, some programs need to be rewritten to allow synchronization between computers, and companies like Apple aren't about to do that!
This post has been edited by MickM: 25 December 2010 - 05:32 AM
#12
Posted 25 December 2010 - 11:14 AM
#13
Posted 25 December 2010 - 12:50 PM
#14
Posted 25 December 2010 - 05:04 PM
bebopredux, on 24 December 2010 - 12:31 PM, said:
Dropbox is a true no-brainer for me.
I feel your pain a bit, tho’ I’m sticking with MM. It does suit my needs as I need a bit more than file sharing. I’ll admit, respectfully, that you are a bit nuts for paying a Franklin for MM - there’s always about a dozen sellers or so on eBay hawking MM single packs for $50-$60, with Family Packs (which is my choice) for $65-90 - all with free shipping. Buy.com and Amazon’s always got deals going on MM. Full price for MM is the wrong price to pay!
Help











