Macworld Forums

Macworld Forums: Decorative dingbats add design flexibility - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Decorative dingbats add design flexibility

#1 User is offline   Macworld 

  • Story Poster
  • Group: MW Bot
  • Posts: 31,702
  • Joined: 30-November 07

Posted 28 December 2010 - 04:46 AM

Post your comments for Decorative dingbats add design flexibility here
0

#2 User is offline   samadore 

  • Member
  • Group: Macworld Insiders
  • Posts: 107
  • Joined: 16-February 09

  Posted 28 December 2010 - 05:59 AM

iApp??
0

#3 User is offline   thubsch 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 195
  • Joined: 03-February 10

Posted 28 December 2010 - 07:10 AM

View Postsamadore, on 28 December 2010 - 05:59 AM, said:

iApp??


In-line definition in the 4th paragraph: "...Mac OS X (iApp) applications..." Not too bad, in fact; kind-of for the applications you'll be finding in the Mac OS X App-store, such as the iWork applications... and, it's shorter than "Mac OS X applications" ;) . Unless and until Big Steve decides to trademark "iApp" for something else, that is.
Cheers, Tristan
0

#4 User is offline   Tony1 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 90
  • Joined: 24-May 07

  Posted 28 December 2010 - 06:52 PM

This (and any characters) can also be obtained from any App Menu with
Edit->Special Characters (⌥⌘T)
0

#5 User is offline   samadore 

  • Member
  • Group: Macworld Insiders
  • Posts: 107
  • Joined: 16-February 09

Posted 29 December 2010 - 10:20 PM

View Postthubsch, on 28 December 2010 - 07:10 AM, said:

View Postsamadore, on 28 December 2010 - 05:59 AM, said:

iApp??


In-line definition in the 4th paragraph: "...Mac OS X (iApp) applications..." Not too bad, in fact; kind-of for the applications you'll be finding in the Mac OS X App-store, such as the iWork applications... and, it's shorter than "Mac OS X applications" ;) . Unless and until Big Steve decides to trademark "iApp" for something else, that is.


Yes, saw it in the article. Just surprised as had never heard or seen it used in that context. Author seems to be trying to coin a term which I feel will be confusing. I personally prefer sticking to 'Application' for OS X programs and 'App' for programs on iOS devices. Guess time will tell which moniker catches on.

This post has been edited by samadore: 29 December 2010 - 10:21 PM

0

#6 User is offline   thubsch 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 195
  • Joined: 03-February 10

Posted 30 December 2010 - 07:17 AM

View Postsamadore, on 29 December 2010 - 10:20 PM, said:

View Postthubsch, on 28 December 2010 - 07:10 AM, said:

View Postsamadore, on 28 December 2010 - 05:59 AM, said:

iApp??


In-line definition in the 4th paragraph: "...Mac OS X (iApp) applications..." Not too bad, in fact; kind-of for the applications you'll be finding in the Mac OS X App-store, such as the iWork applications... and, it's shorter than "Mac OS X applications" ;) . Unless and until Big Steve decides to trademark "iApp" for something else, that is.


Yes, saw it in the article. Just surprised as had never heard or seen it used in that context. Author seems to be trying to coin a term which I feel will be confusing. I personally prefer sticking to 'Application' for OS X programs and 'App' for programs on iOS devices. Guess time will tell which moniker catches on.


Oohh... Given the tendency to abbreviate everything, I'd bet on "App". And, given Apple's tendency to infuse Mac OS X with iOS, the difference between "Mac OS X Application" and "iOS App" will dwindle........ to "iApp". B) or :angry: or :( ; as you wish.
Cheers, Tristan
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users