How To: Prepare to switch from AT&T to Verizon
#1
Posted 11 January 2011 - 12:01 PM
#2
Posted 11 January 2011 - 12:15 PM
#3
Posted 11 January 2011 - 12:30 PM
I will be happily staying with ATT. Maybe the competition will drive the price down. That would be nice.
I hope to never have Verizon Wireless again.
#4
Posted 11 January 2011 - 12:34 PM
#5
Posted 11 January 2011 - 12:50 PM
I been waiting for this day and now it came. I want VZ's excellent service. I have had my days with extremely bad customer service of ATT. They are sometimes rude and really awefull.
Thanks,
#6
Posted 11 January 2011 - 12:54 PM
tfrogh, on 11 January 2011 - 12:30 PM, said:
I will be happily staying with ATT. Maybe the competition will drive the price down. That would be nice.
I hope to never have Verizon Wireless again.
Re: whining, Lol!
I know some folks, especially in cities such as SF, have had reason to complain about AT&T. Honestly I've had little trouble with my iPhones and AT&T, so I'll be staying with them too, probably. Otoh, we have Verizon for the landline, as well as FiOS Internet and Television. FiOS rocks.
#7
Posted 11 January 2011 - 03:55 PM
#8
Posted 11 January 2011 - 05:04 PM
tfrogh, on 11 January 2011 - 12:30 PM, said:
I will be happily staying with ATT. Maybe the competition will drive the price down. That would be nice.
I hope to never have Verizon Wireless again.
I don't care how "slow" it is. AT$T may be faster, but in most cases we can't get enough of a signal if one at all to have any speed benefit. As a matter of fact we hook our iPhone to a VZW MiFi for data access, because AT$T plain old sucks. So maybe VZW is "slower", at least it will work in the places we frequent, as in: where the AT$T iPhone is already one, two, three hours out of range. We carry CDMA backup phones because we can't rely on AT$T.
Note that I'm not saying any practices, customer service or prices by any wireless carrier are better than any other, but as far as coverage I think VZW has the edge.
#9
Posted 11 January 2011 - 06:21 PM
This is NUTZ.
I am a fool in the company of countless others, and am considering downsizing drastically.
#10
Posted 12 January 2011 - 08:32 AM
leskern, on 11 January 2011 - 06:21 PM, said:
This is NUTZ.
I am a fool in the company of countless others, and am considering downsizing drastically.
I have 2 iPhones (each 2GB plan) and 1 "vanilla" phone with unlimited Family Text. My AT&T bill is about $172 per month (450 mins and we rarely use them all). I have my cable providers highest internet speed only at $60/month (my own modem saves $5/month), Apple TV 2 with Netflix ($10/month) and a MagicJack for home phone ($20/YEAR) until I get a NetTalk Duo ($30/YEAR). I'm down about as low as one can get, other than dropping down internet speed. If/when Hulu Plus comes to Apple TV, I might consider that.
Overall, I guess I get a good bit of bang for my buck. I can't complain much.
#11
Posted 12 January 2011 - 09:32 AM
redgeminipa, on 12 January 2011 - 08:32 AM, said:
leskern, on 11 January 2011 - 06:21 PM, said:
This is NUTZ.
I am a fool in the company of countless others, and am considering downsizing drastically.
I have 2 iPhones (each 2GB plan) and 1 "vanilla" phone with unlimited Family Text. My AT&T bill is about $172 per month (450 mins and we rarely use them all). I have my cable providers highest internet speed only at $60/month (my own modem saves $5/month), Apple TV 2 with Netflix ($10/month) and a MagicJack for home phone ($20/YEAR) until I get a NetTalk Duo ($30/YEAR). I'm down about as low as one can get, other than dropping down internet speed. If/when Hulu Plus comes to Apple TV, I might consider that.
Overall, I guess I get a good bit of bang for my buck. I can't complain much.
I know this is somewhat off topic from the original article, but I think it's relevant for most readers of this article so I'll pile on:
My family has 2 iphones with the grandfathered unlimited data plan for ~$190/month. We pay $40/month for Time Warner RoadRunner internet service ("up to 10 Mbps", but actual measurements on speedtest.net put it at 13-18 Mbps, great for use with Apple TV2). We pay $17/month for our landline (need it for the building's buzz-in function), which we rarely use but it's nice to have. And we have Netflix with the Blu-ray option for $13/month.
Others might find useful: We used to pay $68/month for DISH Network's America's top 200 pack and renting a dual-tuner DVR (non-HD). I spent the time to figure out what we actually watched, and decided we could drop down to Dish's lowest tier plan (the "Welcome Pack", which is not advertised at all. . . it's only mentioned when you call Dish and ask them what the lowest possible plan they have is. They use it to hold on to customers who might leave otherwise.) Cost for Dish's Welcome pack: $15/month, plus the $5/month DVR rental. So I went from paying $68/month to ~$22/month (with taxes/fees) for satellite TV. The Welcome pack has most of the channels we watch (Comedy Central, all our locals and the big networks, TBS, MSNBC, Food Network, AMC). The few shows my wife watches that are on channels we don't have will be easily bought/rented via iTunes and watched via Apple TV. The extra cost of buying/renting those shows (often, what, 12 episodes per year at $1 or $2 an episode) is far outweighed by the cost savings from dropping down. I'd encourage other Dish customers to seek out the Welcome pack (google it), and call Dish.
So, in total, I guess I'm at ($190 + $40 + $17 +$13 + $22 = ) $282/month for connectivity/internet/TV.
We are too addicted to our iphones to cut those down, although it's been 6 months since they introduced the 2GB limited data plan and so far the most data I've used in a month has been 1 GB, so I could probably drop those down and save $10/month on our two phones. Need the high speed internet. Need the landline and that's as low as it will get. Won't give up netflix and we are enjoying the blu-rays on our HDTV without having to buy them. I guess the only other thing I'd consider would be getting rid of Dish entirely and just relying on the internet and iTunes/Netflix for our TV. But we are so used to the one-handed convenience of a DVR that I think that would be hard for us.
#12
Posted 22 January 2011 - 10:30 PM
icerabbit, on 11 January 2011 - 05:04 PM, said:
tfrogh, on 11 January 2011 - 12:30 PM, said:
I will be happily staying with ATT. Maybe the competition will drive the price down. That would be nice.
I hope to never have Verizon Wireless again.
I don't care how "slow" it is. AT$T may be faster, but in most cases we can't get enough of a signal if one at all to have any speed benefit. As a matter of fact we hook our iPhone to a VZW MiFi for data access, because AT$T plain old sucks. So maybe VZW is "slower", at least it will work in the places we frequent, as in: where the AT$T iPhone is already one, two, three hours out of range. We carry CDMA backup phones because we can't rely on AT$T.
Note that I'm not saying any practices, customer service or prices by any wireless carrier are better than any other, but as far as coverage I think VZW has the edge.
I do the same thing with my iPhone 4 now. Looking at selling it to a friend of mine who can take over my contract so I can jump to the Verizon iPhone.
I think you meant though AT&T has the EDGE. :-)
#13
Posted 14 February 2012 - 08:24 AM
Help














