Adobe ships CS 5.5 updates
#2
Posted 03 May 2011 - 08:03 AM
#3
Posted 03 May 2011 - 08:42 AM
#4
Posted 03 May 2011 - 09:23 AM
I'm a long-time Adobe user but I don't ever remember Adobe doing a partial update on their suites and then charging not only full price for it but actually raising the price from previous upgrades. Can you spell m-o-n-o-p-o-l-y? Grab your ankles.
#5
Posted 03 May 2011 - 09:57 AM
We are using Design Premium CS5 and it is very slick and works very well in 10.6.7 on late-model iMacs. CS5.5 has important new capabilities which we need to keep us with the new demand for e-books and other new media.
Quit parroting your stupid "monopoly" mantra. Quark had its chance back in the day, but squandered it. So did Aldus.
Adobe, like Apple with OS X, created a killer product in inDesign many years ago now, and they haven't rested on their laurels. They deserve to be not only compensated but to profit well from their extensive labor and dedication to making great products--like Apple.
This post has been edited by Danielsw: 03 May 2011 - 09:59 AM
#6
Posted 03 May 2011 - 10:06 AM
#7
Posted 03 May 2011 - 10:36 AM
Danielsw, on 03 May 2011 - 09:57 AM, said:
We are using Design Premium CS5 and it is very slick and works very well in 10.6.7 on late-model iMacs. CS5.5 has important new capabilities which we need to keep us with the new demand for e-books and other new media.
Quit parroting your stupid "monopoly" mantra. Quark had its chance back in the day, but squandered it. So did Aldus.
Adobe, like Apple with OS X, created a killer product in inDesign many years ago now, and they haven't rested on their laurels. They deserve to be not only compensated but to profit well from their extensive labor and dedication to making great products--like Apple.
Adobe "attempted" to compete in the web market with InMotion (Flash killer) and GoLive (Dreamweaver killer). They failed with those half-baked apps and decided to buy Macromedia and by doing so kicked any potential competition to the curb. That's when they became a monopoly.
Now, modest designers who don't work for a lucrative agency struggle to keep up with the steep prices and increases. Ask any European user of Adobe if they're ok with paying what Adobe asks for the international versions. It's obvious why they went from an 18 - 24 month cycle to a 12 month cycle.
I'm happy for you that you have such deep pockets. Don't pass judgement on those less fortunate than yourself.
#8
Posted 03 May 2011 - 10:42 AM
camelz, on 03 May 2011 - 08:58 AM, said:
heimdall, on 03 May 2011 - 08:42 AM, said:
what are you dumb? This is a Mac site. They have no qualms about being biased against Adobe after Jobs Mob ripped into Adobe more than once. This site ALWAYS slants towards an anti-everything stance. If you want an unbiased analysis, head to other sites like Creative Cow. There's no hidden agenda on non-Apple fanboy sites.
Biased against Adobe? For saying that Flash sucked on Mobile devices? Most people now see that was true. Mobile devices which support flash now don't provide a great experience and most of the flash content for mobile devices has to be redone so that it is even useable on mobile devices. Which begs the question, if you have to redo the flash video content just for mobile devices, why not just use HTML5? Like Jobs suggested. Jobs ripped Adobe, well, because they deserved it. And many people, PC and Mac, are not pleased with Adobe's quick yet expensive upgrade with minimal improvements...
#9
Posted 03 May 2011 - 11:28 AM
The upgrade from CS5 to CS5.5, while expensive, isn't full price. It's $549 for the Master Collection.
#10
Posted 03 May 2011 - 11:47 AM
#11
Posted 03 May 2011 - 11:50 AM
Raymondo17, on 03 May 2011 - 11:28 AM, said:
The upgrade from CS5 to CS5.5, while expensive, isn't full price. It's $549 for the Master Collection.
Adobe new upgrade prices:
$549 - Master Collection
$399 - Design Premium
$299 - Design Standard
$399 - Web Premium
$399 - Production Premium
Seems awfully expensive for a half a version upgrade with minimal additional useful features.
#13
Posted 03 May 2011 - 04:00 PM
I have to say NO (!) to ADOBE monopoly this time ...
#14
Posted 03 May 2011 - 10:41 PM
camelz, on 03 May 2011 - 08:58 AM, said:
heimdall, on 03 May 2011 - 08:42 AM, said:
what are you dumb? This is a Mac site. They have no qualms about being biased against Adobe after Jobs Mob ripped into Adobe more than once. This site ALWAYS slants towards an anti-everything stance. If you want an unbiased analysis, head to other sites like Creative Cow. There's no hidden agenda on non-Apple fanboy sites.
Please. Don't suggest that "Apple fanboy sites" like (according to you) this one have an agenda whereas "other" sites do not, while asking "are you dumb?" You're only insulting yourself.
Help













