Page 1 of 1
Hype 1.0.3 lets you create HTML 5 animations without coding
#1
Posted 08 August 2011 - 06:01 AM
Post your comments for Hype 1.0.3 lets you create HTML 5 animations without coding here
#2
Posted 08 August 2011 - 07:50 AM
It would be interesting to do a comparison of Hype and Aquafadas' new MotionComposer. Are they covering the same territory, do they do the same things?
#3
Posted 08 August 2011 - 08:19 AM
I suspect we're going to see a ton of these type of "HTML5" sites, similar to Flash sites, with non standard navigation, lack of browser controls like a back button in some instances, and horrible for SEO. This will drive adware up tremendously.
#5
Posted 08 August 2011 - 09:44 AM
"I would also like to see a comparison with Adobe Hype. It is great to see the competition."
Hype is not from Adobe, heaven forbid. You must be confusing Hype with Edge.
Hype is not from Adobe, heaven forbid. You must be confusing Hype with Edge.
#7
Posted 08 August 2011 - 01:01 PM
#9
Posted 07 December 2011 - 08:49 AM
Hype es una buena herramienta, facil y practica. Sin embargo no genera HTML 5, genera un archivo en javascript en el cual se guarda todo el contedio. Finalmente este archivo se incrusta en un archivo HTML. Lo malo de ello es que Google no puede indexar el contenido por estar en javascript.
#10
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:51 AM
Can this app import and edit existing web site created in front page?
#12
Posted 05 June 2012 - 05:44 PM
JorgeMunoz, on 07 December 2011 - 08:49 AM, said:
Hype es una buena herramienta, facil y practica. Sin embargo no genera HTML 5, genera un archivo en javascript en el cual se guarda todo el contedio. Finalmente este archivo se incrusta en un archivo HTML. Lo malo de ello es que Google no puede indexar el contenido por estar en javascript.
For those who don't understand Spanish (curious that he chose to answer an all-English page in Spanish)... he says that this thing doesn't really generate HTML 5; it just generates a bunch of Javascript that manipulates the content. Then it puts it into an HTML archive. The bad thing about this is that Google can't index the content.
Anyone know if that's true? The review should've had some discussion of what the generated code looks like.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1
Help











