Kaspersky Lab suspends Flashback-fighting tool
#1
Posted 12 April 2012 - 12:31 PM
#2
Posted 12 April 2012 - 01:08 PM
#3
Posted 12 April 2012 - 01:27 PM
#4
Posted 12 April 2012 - 02:01 PM
Mac OS X doesn't need aftermarket AV. Even Microsoft are starting to push in-house AV in the form of MS Security Essentials, and discouraging users from using third-party products.
#5
Posted 12 April 2012 - 03:02 PM
#6
Posted 12 April 2012 - 03:32 PM
#7
Posted 12 April 2012 - 05:08 PM
#8
Posted 12 April 2012 - 06:33 PM
rthuringer, on 12 April 2012 - 03:02 PM, said:
Apparently, you didn't get the memo; Apple did this already, back in 2009. ( reference ) In fact, there are reports that Apple updated the definitions for that built-in malware protection to address a previous version of Flashback, as recently as November 2011. ( reference )
The real question in my mind, is why did Apple need to release two separate Java updaters in order to address this latest incarnation of Flashback? Was XProtect not capable of dealing with it, for some reason?
- Hackintosh: 2.3GHz AMD Quad-Core/4GB RAM/multiple HDs/GeForce 8600 GTS w/256MB
- Verizon iPhone 4
- AppleTV (2nd Gen)
- 1TB Time Capsule
- 80GB iPod Classic
#9
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:15 PM
lkrupp, on 12 April 2012 - 03:32 PM, said:
No excuse for Kaspersky. This is very embarrasing for them. One could go into their possible inexperience with OSX vs. Windows, but it's very poor form.
As for myself (being an idiot according to Salvo's definition above), for the benefit of fellow candidate idiots, I installed Norton Internet Security on a Mac Mini and it went off without a hitch. No noticable performance impact. If things stay well, I'll install it on the other four Macs in the house. Word of advise, exclude your Time Machine drive, because of the way it's structured and implimented the intial system scan will take forever... If you don't have issues on your main drives, the Time Machine will be okay too.
This post has been edited by klahanas: 12 April 2012 - 07:20 PM
But glittering prizes and endless compromises
Shatter the illusion of integrity."
-Rush
#10
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:59 PM
klahanas, on 12 April 2012 - 07:15 PM, said:
lkrupp, on 12 April 2012 - 03:32 PM, said:
No excuse for Kaspersky. This is very embarrasing for them. One could go into their possible inexperience with OSX vs. Windows, but it's very poor form.
As for myself (being an idiot according to Salvo's definition above), for the benefit of fellow candidate idiots, I installed Norton Internet Security on a Mac Mini and it went off without a hitch. No noticable performance impact. If things stay well, I'll install it on the other four Macs in the house. Word of advise, exclude your Time Machine drive, because of the way it's structured and implimented the intial system scan will take forever... If you don't have issues on your main drives, the Time Machine will be okay too.
Come to think of it, my advise is inadequate, the Time Machine would be a great place to hide malware. They need to figure out a way to scan it without rescanning every file five thousand times...
But glittering prizes and endless compromises
Shatter the illusion of integrity."
-Rush
#11
Posted 12 April 2012 - 11:59 PM
rthuringer, on 12 April 2012 - 03:02 PM, said:
What about Gatekeeper? It will feature the next OS X release (aka Mountain Lion). You can choose from three different settings; "allow installation from any source", "allow installation only from Mac App Store" and the third is "allow installation from only secure source and Mac App Store" if I recall correctly.
I guess with the most strict level such a trojan has not a chance since the OS does not allow its installation at all.
#12
Posted 13 April 2012 - 03:33 AM
#13
Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:22 AM
#14
Posted 28 May 2012 - 08:56 AM
lkrupp, on 12 April 2012 - 03:32 PM, said:
Well, if Kaspersky's tool really did hose users' systems, they are now more secure because that End User can't access it to screw it up more. That counts for something, right?
Help













