Intel releases Ivy Bridge: New Mac models coming soon?
#1
Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:16 PM
#2
Posted 23 April 2012 - 03:49 PM
#3
Posted 23 April 2012 - 04:11 PM
#4
Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:00 PM
#5
Posted 23 April 2012 - 05:55 PM
#6
Posted 23 April 2012 - 07:54 PM
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
#7
Posted 23 April 2012 - 10:30 PM
The new mac line pretty much tells the tale of how Mr. Cook sees the company.
All ipads and hipster portables with no thought for increasingly irrelevant pro users?
I thought Apple was waiting for the new Xeons, then the new Geforces, but no.
There's some hope left they were waiting for desktop parts, 8-core i7 in miditower
would be sufficient for most users and a whole lot cheaper than a xeon based thing.
But even that would leave the more pro video editors hanging.
(assuming they havent all switched over yet)
#8
Posted 23 April 2012 - 11:09 PM
roadkill97006, on 23 April 2012 - 04:11 PM, said:
The MacBook Pro is not going to be retired. There may be a 15" MBA, but that won't have anything to do with the MBP plans. Expect to see a new MBP--that is decidedly PRO-- 15" and possibly a 13" as well, within the next 60 days.
This post has been edited by LelandHendrix: 23 April 2012 - 11:10 PM
#9
Posted 24 April 2012 - 06:14 AM
I also share the concern of many posters that Apple has lost interest in most of the Mac line. I think the idea that processors are all pretty fast now so we don't need to get the latest one is still wrong. Although I never edit video, I've found every Mac I've ever owned to be too slow when switching between multiple programs.
I think a top-of-the-line iMac would do me fine as regards performance, but I've long since left all-in-ones behind me. I'd love to see a more powerful Mini and a more powerful MacBook Pro.
#10
Posted 24 April 2012 - 08:50 AM
#11
Posted 24 April 2012 - 08:50 AM
roadkill97006, on 23 April 2012 - 04:11 PM, said:
The rumours are from one "Analyst" who hasn't been right yet (or if he was, I missed it, and is more of a shotgun approach)
#12
Posted 24 April 2012 - 08:52 AM
rlav, on 24 April 2012 - 06:14 AM, said:
I also share the concern of many posters that Apple has lost interest in most of the Mac line. I think the idea that processors are all pretty fast now so we don't need to get the latest one is still wrong. Although I never edit video, I've found every Mac I've ever owned to be too slow when switching between multiple programs.
I think a top-of-the-line iMac would do me fine as regards performance, but I've long since left all-in-ones behind me. I'd love to see a more powerful Mini and a more powerful MacBook Pro.
Same as before Sandy Bridge, there were Core i3/i5/i7 models. Other specs in the system usually help identify which model it is (the newest, or the previous)
#13
Posted 24 April 2012 - 02:49 PM
#14
Posted 24 April 2012 - 03:22 PM
rlav, on 24 April 2012 - 06:14 AM, said:
Really? Unless I'm just running a ton of professional apps which take serious resources, I've never had a problem switching back and forth between programs (which is something I do all the time).
That said, even if you do experience problems, Macs tend to already have higher-end processors so I'm not sure what you expect them to do.
Help











