Apple releases security update, Flashback removal tool for Leopard
#1
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:15 PM
#2
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:40 PM
Quite sad, ancient PCs running XP get Flash updates. Machines far older than my G5.
#3
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:21 PM
#4
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:32 PM
tfrogh, on 14 May 2012 - 01:40 PM, said:
Quite sad, ancient PCs running XP get Flash updates. Machines far older than my G5.
Once again.... this has nothing to do with Adobe Flash.
it is malware code that runs in Java. (Not Javascript).
I'm glad Apple has released the Leopard version of the removal tool. We use a number of old PowerMacs that are running Tiger, I wonder if they are not susceptible to Flashback? Or is that truly "too old"?
#5
Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:14 PM
#6
Posted 14 May 2012 - 04:04 PM
TeaEarleGreyHot, on 14 May 2012 - 02:32 PM, said:
tfrogh, on 14 May 2012 - 01:40 PM, said:
Quite sad, ancient PCs running XP get Flash updates. Machines far older than my G5.
Once again.... this has nothing to do with Adobe Flash.
it is malware code that runs in Java. (Not Javascript).
I'm glad Apple has released the Leopard version of the removal tool. We use a number of old PowerMacs that are running Tiger, I wonder if they are not susceptible to Flashback? Or is that truly "too old"?
Perhaps you should read the article again. Apple released TWO updates. The Flashback malware removal tool AND an update just like the one they released for 10.6 and 10.7 that will disable the Flash Player plug-in if it is an old version (last version it allows was released in 2010 sometime) So yes, this does have to do with Flash Player plug-in.
#7
Posted 14 May 2012 - 04:43 PM
MorrisTheCat, on 14 May 2012 - 04:04 PM, said:
Thank you, MorrisTheCat, I did re-read it and you are correct.
If the site software would allow me to edit my initial post in this thread, I would
This post has been edited by TeaEarleGreyHot: 14 May 2012 - 04:46 PM
#8
Posted 14 May 2012 - 05:24 PM
alterbentzion, on 14 May 2012 - 02:21 PM, said:
With a G4 running 10.5.8 did get the same results. I then tried manually updating by downloading the update files but the installer package would not run, must be intel only- although that is not stated anywhere in this article or apple's system requirements for both updates.
#9
Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:31 PM
Must be Intel only..
#10
Posted 15 May 2012 - 03:33 AM
TeaEarleGreyHot, on 14 May 2012 - 04:43 PM, said:
You can from the forum side of things, just not from below the story. So just reply to any post, then click on the story title in the bread crumb trail towards the top of the screen (for this story it's the line starting with: "Macworld Forums> Macworld Talk> Story Discussion> Apple releases security update, Flashback removal tool for Leopard" with the last link being the one for the story) and viola - you are in the thread for this story.
Why the !^#%@# the webmasters can't just put the stupid direct link to the story back in is beyond me
This post has been edited by DocNo: 15 May 2012 - 03:34 AM
#11
Posted 15 May 2012 - 04:39 AM
tfrogh, on 14 May 2012 - 01:40 PM, said:
Quite sad, ancient PCs running XP get Flash updates. Machines far older than my G5.
Last night I powered up the Appa and Momo (G5 Tower and G5 iMac). Neither of them could be updated. I guess Apple really considers the G-series to be not worth the trouble.
Oh well, I'll be sure to do my part keeping the infection story in the news by running my old machines and having the Anti-Mac crowd keeping hollering about the infection rate.
Really really stooopid of Apple and Adobe.
#12
Posted 15 May 2012 - 06:06 AM
#13
Posted 15 May 2012 - 06:12 AM
DocNo, on 15 May 2012 - 03:33 AM, said:
Are you sure about this, DocNo? I'm aware of the oddity you describe, and yet I find that after some time has passed (or a post is replied to perhaps?), the "edit" button disappears even from the forum side of things. I actually did look for it... Oh well, not something I need to dwell on.
#14
Posted 15 May 2012 - 06:47 AM
2) When I downloaded these updates they wouldn't run.
Clearly, they're for Intel Macs only. But another question comes to mind: Does the Flashback malware run on PPC Macs? If it involves any kind of "executable" application/program (and I should think it must) then it would have to be coded as "Universal". Given that expert malware coders have been trained and experienced entirely in the Intel environment, and that the number of PPC Macs, six years after the Big Transition, is a very small percentage of the target "audience", it would seem to be hardly worth their trouble to learn to code a Universal Mac app. So maybe there's not much to worry about for PPC Mac users.
TenFourFox Development explores security for PPC Macs in a recent blog post
http://tenfourfox.bl...nket-blues.html
"...while no PowerPC machines were known to be exploited by the recent Flashback worm, our previous analysis shows that the flaw was real; it's just that the actual payload was Intel-only, so it could not run even though it was possible to gain the privileges it would have required to be successful." But there are other issues it seems; the article is worth a read.
I don't use 10.5 regularly myself, nor PPC Macs, but for those who do, it's increasingly the sort of hobby that will require constant tweaking, like an old car.
This post has been edited by HandyMac: 15 May 2012 - 06:52 AM
Help












