[Macworld]

Post your comments for User vote on Facebook privacy policies hasn't stemmed criticism here

[eyhk]

This is a scham. No easily identifiable information other than Vote for NEW! or Vote for OLD! Clicking on the various links they provide go heavily into legalise and blocks of texts that no average user will spend time reading, let alone 1/3 of their entire (active and non-active)user base. If Facebook wasn't making money, I'd almost say it was simply a scientific research trying to measure just how much [censored] users will take before quitting.

[thomaspin]

Interesting. If 30% is binding and let's assume that it constitutes more than half of active users, then 60% represents 100% of active users, meaning the 900 million oft claimed 'user' number is overstated by 40% and is really 540 million.

[JillKennedy]

Of course it doesn't really matter (and never has) what users think. It only matters now what shareholders think. And I'm sure right now shareholders think nothing Facebook is doing is right.
http://mankabros.com...ring-valuation/