Cook: Apple planning professional Mac for 2013
#1
Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:10 PM
#2
Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:23 PM
#3
Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:25 PM
#5
Posted 12 June 2012 - 01:50 PM
#6
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:03 PM
#7
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:04 PM
#8
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:06 PM
KaiHowells, on 12 June 2012 - 02:03 PM, said:
They obviously screwed up the timing... and by the time whatever it is gets here the current Mac Pros will be absurdly outdated, but at least there is life in the Pro line. That was what irked me most yesterday, and the way they apparently were handling it. This whole mess proves communication is everything in business. Even for a secretive company like Apple.
#9
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:40 PM
Photonerd, on 12 June 2012 - 02:06 PM, said:
KaiHowells, on 12 June 2012 - 02:03 PM, said:
They obviously screwed up the timing... and by the time whatever it is gets here the current Mac Pros will be absurdly outdated, but at least there is life in the Pro line. That was what irked me most yesterday, and the way they apparently were handling it. This whole mess proves communication is everything in business. Even for a secretive company like Apple.
Unless you consider waiting for a Xeon processor that supports Thunderbolt and USB 3 bad timing. Anything they would have done to add Thunderbolt to the current Mac Pro even with these new processors would be a hack. The Xeons we're really waiting for are coming out next Winter or Spring.
I'm betting a year from now it will be perfect timing for a new Mac Pro announcement at WWDC. Just about the time I'm gonna get married. So I guess I'll just have to wait even longer.
Or, of course, I could probably settle for the MacBook Pro with Retina Display for home.
This post has been edited by leicaman: 12 June 2012 - 02:41 PM
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
#10
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:46 PM
#11
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:49 PM
From Intel's public roadmap (http://www.intel.com...map-article.pdf ) it looks like there are no CPUs that are not out this year that will be out next year. So why the long wait then, looks like Apple is not waiting on a CPU. Perhaps Apple has an exclusive on a new CPU (128 cores) and they are waiting until next year when the next OS X version aka "Mountain Goat" is released optimized for the 128 cores? Maybe 10X Thunderbolt aka "Zapperbolt" will be released - 4 bidirectional 100 Gbps Zapperbolt ports each on the new Mac Pro?
Here's to next year...
#12
Posted 12 June 2012 - 02:53 PM
#14
Posted 12 June 2012 - 03:08 PM
bettercitizens, on 12 June 2012 - 02:49 PM, said:
From Intel's public roadmap (http://www.intel.com...map-article.pdf ) it looks like there are no CPUs that are not out this year that will be out next year. So why the long wait then, looks like Apple is not waiting on a CPU. Perhaps Apple has an exclusive on a new CPU (128 cores) and they are waiting until next year when the next OS X version aka "Mountain Goat" is released optimized for the 128 cores? Maybe 10X Thunderbolt aka "Zapperbolt" will be released - 4 bidirectional 100 Gbps Zapperbolt ports each on the new Mac Pro?
Here's to next year...
A more careful reading of that document will show that "later next year" there will be Xeon processors based on the current Ivy Bridge architecture. This is how Intel does things. Sandy Bridge Xeons (32 nm E5 Series) were introduced in March, even though the desktop platform was introduced 10-11 months prior. The Xeons that Apple will likely use in the new Mac Pro will be based on the newly introduced 22nm process now being introduced in consumer machines. Why the wait, though, I really don't know. 16-core Mac Pros sure would have been nice.
This post has been edited by nathanimal: 12 June 2012 - 03:09 PM
Help












