Macworld Forums

Macworld Forums: Review: Organize task manager for Mac is deep and complex - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Review: Organize task manager for Mac is deep and complex

#1 User is offline   Macworld 

  • Story Poster
  • Group: MW Bot
  • Posts: 31,664
  • Joined: 30-November 07

Posted 05 November 2012 - 03:00 AM

Post your comments for Review: Organize task manager for Mac is deep and complex here
0

#2 User is offline   aestival 

  • Member
  • Group: Macworld Insiders
  • Posts: 548
  • Joined: 04-October 04

  Posted 05 November 2012 - 04:01 AM

"... a discreet unit ..." -- shhhh... I think you mean discrete :-)
0

#3 User is offline   PrachiGauriar 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 20
  • Joined: 28-September 10

  Posted 05 November 2012 - 07:27 AM

I think you meant to put “Steep learning curve for a task manager” in the list of cons, not pros.
1

#4 User is offline   kranbollin 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 31-August 05

  Posted 05 November 2012 - 09:01 AM

A steep curve is good: it means a high rate, i.e. fast. I know this is a losing battle with common usage, but the use of 'steep learning curve' to mean 'hard to learn' is just wrong.
0

#5 User is offline   js2098 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 05-November 12

  Posted 05 November 2012 - 09:27 AM

This has some great features, but it still requires the use of an outside application. The majority of my tasks come in via email. Taskbox (taskbox.co) combines email and task management. iOS only right now, but a desktop version to come.
0

#6 User is online   precision 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 02-December 07

  Posted 06 December 2012 - 06:26 AM

Seems too complex. What ever happened to InControl?
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users