Macworld Forums

Macworld Forums: The Macalope: High-hanging fruit - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Macalope: High-hanging fruit

#1 User is offline   Macworld 

  • Story Poster
  • Group: MW Bot
  • Posts: 31,694
  • Joined: 30-November 07

Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:30 AM

Post your comments for The Macalope: High-hanging fruit here
0

#2 User is offline   KPOM 

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,358
  • Joined: 14-December 07

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:46 AM

On top of that, now that it is getting serious traction, Samsung (the poster child for the "open" Android's success) is adding its own APIs, and experimenting with different operating systems. In other words, it is becoming less "open."
0

#3 User is offline   quakerotis 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 318
  • Joined: 12-June 07

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 07:48 AM

As a nitwit, I resemble some of the remarks made here.
Apology accepted. carry on...
0

#4 User is offline   sinclairmacleod 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 06-October 11

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 08:20 AM

Thank goodness, dear Macalope, that you are inoculated against the epidemic of stupidity that is running through the journalistic ranks. The New Yorker used to be known for quality journalism and yet today they publish an article that calls the launch of the iPhone 5 'tepid' while the Galaxy Note is a roaring success and guess what Apple is doomed. As a Brit, I find it bizarre the cheerleading in American journals for a foreign company with, at best, questionable business tactics.
Thanks for keeping me sane.
3

#5 User is offline   patriotusa 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 134
  • Joined: 09-September 04

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 09:27 AM

I'm glad you mentioned protected and dynamic memory. Before OS X I was having a real hard time defending the old Mac OS because of the lack of these features. Friends or relatives would call me saying they had bought more RAM for their Mac because their browser kept giving them out-of-memory errors, but it didn't help. I would then have to explain that they wasted their money on more RAM because all they needed to do was get info on the application and manually assign more memory to it. By 2000 I had given up recommending Macs to friends and was seriously considering switching to Windows. Thank goodness for OS X and its modern memory management.
0

#6 User is offline   SuperMatt 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 05-February 10

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 11:15 AM

Windows is open? So they give the source code away for free? Really? Somebody tell the Winotaur!
3

#7 User is offline   StefN 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 52
  • Joined: 22-January 08

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:01 PM

I like to leave the comment "Macaloped" on the article sites. What would really help is a Macalope call to go with it. I checked Animal Planet. No luck, oddly. Closest I can find is a moose call, which I will render thusly: "Yooahhh. Wah. Wah. Wah." Can we have a native Macalope call rendering to use?
0

#8 User is offline   whisper 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 21-March 05

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 03:12 PM

Quote

I like to leave the comment "Macaloped" on the article sites. What would really help is a Macalope call to go with it. I checked Animal Planet. No luck, oddly. Closest I can find is a moose call, which I will render thusly: "Yooahhh. Wah. Wah. Wah." Can we have a native Macalope call rendering to use?



Shouldn't the Macalope sound like a 3.5" floppy being ejected given the classic Mac as a head?
0

#9 User is offline   wesley96 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 141
  • Joined: 18-August 05

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 04:30 PM

I like to have what Tim Wu is smoking because he's actually putting Microsoft in the "open" category. Hoo-ah. Windows is popular and is used on a dominant platform, but that has nothing to do with it being open.
0

#10 User is offline   bastion 

  • Power User
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9,100
  • Joined: 14-October 04

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 06:17 PM

Windows has never been more open than Mac OS by any defensible definition of the term.
1

#11 User is offline   immovableobject 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: New Members
  • Posts: 8
  • Joined: 03-March 12

  Posted 26 February 2013 - 10:26 PM

The extent of Windows' "openness" is that it is licensed to multiple computer vendors. This is a different kind of "open" than open source, but it does offer some benefit. Windows-based computers have become a commodity offering consumers a wide range of choice, from cheap crappy systems to specialized systems for niche markets.

One downside of this arrangement is that the OS and hardware are not as closely tuned to each other as with Apple's Macs. Microsoft can't possibly QA their software on every potential configuration. When it comes time for support, there is finger pointing. Neither Microsoft nor the computer company are inclined to take full responsibility. The user is caught in the middle. This presents opportunities for PC experts who are only happy to recommend Windows solutions and charge plenty to support them. That's the hidden Microsoft tax.
0

#12 User is offline   technolawyer 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 109
  • Joined: 15-June 07

  Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:28 AM

Netscape was an influential company, but not a successful company. In its best year, Netscape earned a profit of just $23 Million and had working capital of just $202 Million. Netscape lost money during most of its other years in existence.

Apparently, Tim Wu never bothered to review Netscape's SEC filings. What's more frightening is that his editor at the New Yorker never thought to ask, "Are you sure about including Netscape in that litany?" This explains why I stopped reading the New Yorker a while ago.

Apple, having just reported its best quarter, is of course doomed. Let's hope Tim Cook doesn't borrow from Netscape's playbook. If he does, AOL will end up buying Apple for a few billion dollars.

The Macalope is wrong. This isn't high hanging fruit. It's highbrow low hanging fruit.
0

#13 User is offline   technolawyer 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 109
  • Joined: 15-June 07

  Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:40 AM

Quote

Shouldn't the Macalope sound like a 3.5" floppy being ejected given the classic Mac as a head?


I presume you mean expensive electric ones Apple used as opposed to the cheap manual ones everyone else used. Even when Mac OS didn't have protected memory, Apple still made nice hardware, albeit beige.
0

#14 User is offline   StefN 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 52
  • Joined: 22-January 08

  Posted 27 February 2013 - 06:44 AM

Quote

Shouldn't the Macalope sound like a 3.5" floppy being ejected given the classic Mac as a head?

Maybe as a courting call?
0

Share this topic:


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users