Opinion: Mac Enterprise backup options are looking up
#1
Posted 18 May 2007 - 11:10 AM
#2
Posted 18 May 2007 - 02:24 PM
#3
Posted 18 May 2007 - 02:29 PM
#4
Posted 18 May 2007 - 05:32 PM
Proprietary software takes your data hostage. Invest in open source tools.
Archiving on optical is much safer and the formats are more long-lived than magnetic tape.
The ability of Windows and Linux/Unix applications to accurately back up HFS formatted partitions, including resource fork and metadata, should certainly be suspect.
The crux of the matter. Now that Apple has essentially provided a standard way to separate data and resource forks, it almost makes the most sense to separate the two and back up and archive them together. Restore simply involves restoring to a volume exposed by CIFS so the two pieces get attached at the client.
Chasd
#5
Posted 18 May 2007 - 05:53 PM
#6
Posted 18 May 2007 - 06:11 PM
#7
Posted 18 May 2007 - 07:42 PM
#8
Posted 19 May 2007 - 05:48 AM
-Matt
#9
Posted 20 May 2007 - 09:27 AM
I can totally erase and restore hundreds of Windows boxes within an hour, when needing to update or replace software, updated data files, via Deep Freeze or Symantec's GHOST. A just-as-easy Mac solution has been so danged elusive and evasive.
#10
Posted 20 May 2007 - 02:23 PM
http://www.faronics.com
Dan
#11
Posted 20 May 2007 - 02:39 PM
We run several Macintosh labs in an educational institution and are begging for a GHOSTING or DEEP FREEZE solution methodology. Is there a solution for several Macs that are in a lab environment, identically set up (cloned) with site-wide licenses?
I can totally erase and restore hundreds of Windows boxes within an hour, when needing to update or replace software, updated data files, via Deep Freeze or Symantec's GHOST. A just-as-easy Mac solution has been so danged elusive and evasive.
Some individuals at the University of Utah had made some great strides doing exactly what you want to do. I actually attended a seminar and was able to visit their labs. It was very impressive what they had set up and worked well. I don't recall all the specifics, I do know it used rsync. I would give you the contact info but it wasn't specific to my situation I am currently in and don't have it on file any more.
One other poster made a comment about Retrospect and the problems it currently has. I can confirm Retrospect is completely unusable as a back up solution because it is not reliable any more. This is a sad state as I used Retrospect back in the glory days and LOVED it. It not only worked well but was easy to use.
I think ease of use on the mac platform is a key component some of the new "competitors". A mac server works well for small to medium size business because it doesn't take an expert to get it set up. Retrospect was great because it was easy to set up and restore from the GUI. I have tried BRU and it still leaves a bit to be desired in terms of the GUI.
#12
Posted 20 May 2007 - 03:12 PM
#13
Posted 20 May 2007 - 10:50 PM
You might find some useful information here as well:
http://www.macosxlabs.org/
#14
Posted 21 May 2007 - 12:01 AM
MacAdministrator
Help











