Bugs & Fixes: Time Machine holdups
#2
Posted 16 May 2008 - 09:19 AM
Then it advised me that I have two hard disks of the same name, I reformatted again. Apple could not help.
I returned the unit.
I am now using Time Machine with an external hard drive, no such problems.
I find it odd that nobody comments on the clunky programming. The machine freezes up for a few minutes, sometimes much longer. There is no progress bar. Cancel does not work and you cannot force quit.
This could be a great feature if it worked. Maybe in 10.6?
#4
Posted 16 May 2008 - 10:15 AM
It makes sense for Preparing to take longer the longer you wait between projects, because more things have changed.
#5
Posted 16 May 2008 - 10:33 AM
I have the exact error described in the article with a new 1 tb Time Capsule. The only way to resolve it that I've found is to delete the existing backup and let Time Machine start over from scratch. Hardly a good solution, and with a large drive, very time consuming.
I think the best backup has to be one using Carboncopy or SuperDuper, which leaves the user with a fully bootable copy of their drive. You are more likely to have your drive go completely bad and suffer a total loss of your OS and data than you are to need to restore only a few files.
While handy, I wouldn't say that Time Machine is the be-all or end-all of backups. It is certainly better than nothing--don't get me wrong--but for seasoned user who understands what "backup" really means, a WD Portfolio drive along with a copy of Carboncopy or SuperDuper is more reliable and functional than Time Capsule and Time Machine. To prove my point, just look at all the problems that people are having trying to get TM to work.
#6
Posted 16 May 2008 - 10:45 AM
rlockhart said:
I have the exact error described in the article with a new 1 tb Time Capsule. The only way to resolve it that I've found is to delete the existing backup and let Time Machine start over from scratch. Hardly a good solution, and with a large drive, very time consuming.
I think the best backup has to be one using Carboncopy or SuperDuper, which leaves the user with a fully bootable copy of their drive. You are more likely to have your drive go completely bad and suffer a total loss of your OS and data than you are to need to restore only a few files.
While handy, I wouldn't say that Time Machine is the be-all or end-all of backups. It is certainly better than nothing--don't get me wrong--but for seasoned user who understands what "backup" really means, a WD Portfolio drive along with a copy of Carboncopy or SuperDuper is more reliable and functional than Time Capsule and Time Machine. To prove my point, just look at all the problems that people are having trying to get TM to work.
I agree with you except on the point about the more likely even is a hard drive crash then having to restore the occasional file. I upgraded software that was patch with insufficiently tested code only to be left with the option of reinstalling the application from scratch. What is worse is that some developers no longer offer the "working" version of that Application. Time Machine saved the day.
Also saving over a file and overriding it with a new bad version that happened to have the same name. Or copying files from a transport disk, only to later find out you just overwrote all your latest work with old files. This is what Time Machine was written for.
But you do have a point in stating that it's not the ultimate backup solution.
#7
Posted 16 May 2008 - 12:06 PM
#8
Posted 16 May 2008 - 12:57 PM
#9
Posted 16 May 2008 - 05:38 PM
My Time Machine started interrupting itself in the middle of a backup, first on one notebook, then on another. It started not seeing its assigned backup disk attached to Airport Extreme.
All this seems very buggy, and unreliable. But Steve promised us this with OS X.5 and they should deliver fixes as soon as possible. I know it can work because it was working for my MacBook and MacBook Pro when I first set them up after 10.5.2 came out.
#10
Posted 16 May 2008 - 09:10 PM
#11
Posted 16 May 2008 - 09:40 PM
#12
Posted 16 May 2008 - 10:47 PM
those backups didn't make it. they got completely corrupt. i fixed it via disk utility.... some file structure repair, but somedays back when i tried to retrieve a GB worth of files, they were all corrupt. then i had to reformat the drive but it still corrupted anything and everything placed within. so i drove a nail right through it :) ... nice way to destroy drives. huh?
I AGREE!!! I HADN'T BACKED UP FOR A SOLID 10 DAYS! but had i known this earlier, i'd have done it everyday. i am on a macbook and i move around a lot so it is virtually impossible to have the drive connected all the time.
i am just happy that i am back with my backups [a fresh one] and yes, after reading this article, i'll backup atleast once a day.
thanks.
#13
Posted 16 May 2008 - 11:55 PM
If you start a Time Machine backup wirelessly and then plug directly into the computer via USB, it will continue to backup to the sparsebundle over USB, so you can go back and forth no problem.
#14
Posted 17 May 2008 - 06:57 AM
http://discussions.a...hreadID=1476501
I can see why wireless backups were yanked from Leopard just before it's release. Even Apple techs are admitting that it's not very reliable yet. I think even TimeCapsule probably should have been held back another 6 months until they figured this out. We're Apple Certified Techs in the field and we've had to delete sparse images and start over with 8-10 hour initial backups at least 5 times since our 1TB arrived for shop use during the first week of shipping. That's just unacceptable.
Oh, and in case I failed to mention, they seem to be causing widespread incidences of kernel panics once they become corrupt.
Fun city.
Mick



Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote