Sign In
Register
Help
Biallystock said:
Still it would be nice not to have a kernel panic, just because you put your Mac to sleep.
Oh, I get it now. You're demanding some sort of stable operating system that acts as advertised. Talk about yer dreamers.... :-)
What I Hate about Leopard
MultiQuote
#128
Biallystock 
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 345
- Joined: 22-August 07
Posted 06 July 2008 - 10:22 PM
If I am in a "demanding" mood I'd also like to demand that Mail got usable and stopped screwing up my log-in to my ISP and gave secure backups and methods to recover from the inevitable OSX cock-ups that lead to reinstallations.
My email is in total disarray after being moved & "fixed" probably 4-5 times. The last being when AppleCare got me to trash my preferences to "fix" a networking issue.
Why not just have Mail use clearly labeled mailboxes in findable locations, that can be instated with a drag and drop?
My email is in total disarray after being moved & "fixed" probably 4-5 times. The last being when AppleCare got me to trash my preferences to "fix" a networking issue.
Why not just have Mail use clearly labeled mailboxes in findable locations, that can be instated with a drag and drop?
#129
john133
- Newbie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 08-July 08
Posted 08 July 2008 - 01:31 AM
Having made the switch from Windows to Mac for the first time. I cannot say for certain whether Leopard is a pain in comparison to other OS X. I will tell you one thing though - it beats the crap out of vista, xp, et al. It's true what they say... once you go Mac.
John
http://www.guidetopo...Layne-Flack.php
John
http://www.guidetopo...Layne-Flack.php
#130
GazelleIntense
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 586
- Joined: 26-September 01
Posted 28 July 2008 - 02:27 PM
I paid $137 for leopard a week ago. 7 days later I went back to tiger.
leopard ran terrible on my aluminum imac... even with 2 gigs of ram.... the finder was very slow.... which was not an issue with tiger.
I can't believe I spent $ for this..... for slowness, and what just looked and felt inferior to Tiger.
I have sold it on ebay to recoup $75 of my money..... I will be using tiger for a long time apple.... I will not upgrade an OS again... especially one that costs $130+ dollars.
I've used macs 17 years, and upgraded OS's many times... leopard was my worse experience.
Sure time machine is cool, but at $137 bucks its a bit pricey
I spent an hour and a half troubleshooting the slowness on the phone with an apple tech guy... nothing we did would correct the slowness issue.. BUG? Beats me...
leopard ran terrible on my aluminum imac... even with 2 gigs of ram.... the finder was very slow.... which was not an issue with tiger.
I can't believe I spent $ for this..... for slowness, and what just looked and felt inferior to Tiger.
I have sold it on ebay to recoup $75 of my money..... I will be using tiger for a long time apple.... I will not upgrade an OS again... especially one that costs $130+ dollars.
I've used macs 17 years, and upgraded OS's many times... leopard was my worse experience.
Sure time machine is cool, but at $137 bucks its a bit pricey
I spent an hour and a half troubleshooting the slowness on the phone with an apple tech guy... nothing we did would correct the slowness issue.. BUG? Beats me...
#131
macbook1990
- Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 18-February 09
Posted 18 February 2009 - 08:52 PM
I have had my MacBook for over 6 months and have not had a bit of problems. I used to be a PC user and now that I have a Mac I will never go back. It has Leopard on it and it is great. (Much better than Vista!)
