Don't drive iPhone developers away, Apple
#2
Posted 24 September 2008 - 01:23 PM
#3
Posted 24 September 2008 - 01:33 PM
But whatever the exact rules are, Apple needs to specify them upfront before developers invest their effort in building applications. And they can't include something as poorly defined as "duplicate functionality" or "poor taste."
#4
Posted 24 September 2008 - 01:38 PM
1) Include date and time stamps for all user submitted reviews. Not just for applications, but also for music, movies, tv shows, and everything else. People can be reading a review of an application and not know which version the reviewer was referring to. If an application was updated since the review was written, then the review may be out of date.
2) Remember user's sort settings. No matter how many times I choose sort by most recent, the iTunes Store and App Store always default back to sorting by "Most helpful". This is just as annoying as the Finder not remembering view settings.
#8
Posted 24 September 2008 - 01:45 PM
ChopinBlues said:
How many are not appearing? How many are developing "safe" applications instead of something that would actually push the phone in a useful and new direction? Do you know?
#9
Posted 24 September 2008 - 01:45 PM
You could just switch to another phone then.
So I don't see why users would have to be concerned over this. If the well indeed dries up, you just switch to the better alternative.
For people who are developing for the iPhone, it's of course very different, having to worry about their investment of time and money.
#10
Posted 24 September 2008 - 02:01 PM
Rhywun said:
Too bad the same can't be said for some of those users who insist that it's all the developer's fault and Apple can do no wrong.
#11
Posted 24 September 2008 - 02:02 PM
I completely agree with Jason. If people want to create terrible Apps for the App store, I'm ok with it. Poor reviews force developers to make good apps in the future. If I know a developer made a bad app, I won't buy any other apps from them.
Also, the users that will get "confused" are likely to not know how to use the App Store in the first place, or have no need for the app that would confuse them.
#12
Posted 24 September 2008 - 02:07 PM
This couldn't be said any better. Come on Apple, fix this situation, Pronto! Draw the line at malicious apps and then get out of the way and let the market decide.
#13
Posted 24 September 2008 - 02:25 PM
fds said:
You could just switch to another phone then.
So I don't see why users would have to be concerned over this. If the well indeed dries up, you just switch to the better alternative.
For people who are developing for the iPhone, it's of course very different, having to worry about their investment of time and money.
I don't agree. With your frame of mind, I should not be concerned about choices? If Apple is dropping the ball, this will ultimately limit my choice of what is available on the iPhone. Sure, I could just get another phone, but I like this one. I like multi-touche and all of the 200 patents filed on it. I, as a user, want to see it reach it's fullest potential, because it will bring further value to a device that I already own and like.
We do need to be concerned, because we don't want the well to dry up precisely.
#14
Posted 24 September 2008 - 02:28 PM
The iPhone has a web browser, therefore it can access porn. It's a phone, therefore it can call sex chat lines. It now has several eBook readers, therefore it can access written porn. It's game over on the porn thing I'm afraid.



Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote