[Macworld]

Post your comments for Android may not need antivirus software, researcher says here

[RobK]

"the user would decline the download, realizing that a Scrabble game shouldn’t need to read from an e-mail account"
We'd like to keep you updated on future products and releases.
An email address is required to post to the High Scores online.
etc.

[bjojade]

User stupidity is the most common way current trojans get spread. It's so easy to click the OK button that people don't think twice.
While a company can patch holes quickly, it's quicker for a security company to just flag exploits than to re-write code to fix problems. Still, I don't think it's worth the dollars for the minimal added security.

[diorist]

Many, many apps from the Android market require root and/or account access. The user must allow these exceptions on install, really without being given any information on which to base a risk judgment. You can call it stupidity, but it's really just practicality: You want the app, you take the leap. And once you realize you have to allow root access for the G1 equivalent of Notepad, systems privileges just get to feeling pretty dang promiscuous.
As for whether the data is worth accessing...of course it is. Identity data, account data, business data, medical data...it's all in there. In fact, the G1 is even more attractive because it's not just a phone; it's a tiny little portal to the Googleverse. Honestly, statements like "people generally don’t use their phones to access or send the same kind of important data that they do on their PCs," are simply ignorant.
Android needs to get off its butt and get serious about security for the G1. Antivirus software is just a bandaid. Real information protection needs to be baked in to the core, vigilantly monitored, and constantly updated.