> [quote name='himbo']
> >
leicaman said:
> > Yep, so do I. I expect them to feel free to upgrade their hardware without worrying about whether they are going to disable a hack. Hack all you want, but let's not make Apple out to be the bad guy in this particular case. (Or in iPhone firmware updates, or that kind of thing.) They do plenty of things wrong. Let's not pretend this is a bad thing.
> When 100% of their updates break 100% of the popular hacks that people are using to extend the usefulness of their devices, it's not Apple upgrading their hardware without concern about third-party hacks. It's deliberate.
John Gruber of Daring Fireball really hit the nail on the head when he blogged about this a year ago..
Seriously folks. This is simple. If you do unsupported things, expect those things to be unsupported. It really doesn't matter how popular those unsupported things are. They're still unsupported.
> When 100% of their updates break 100% of the popular hacks that people are using to extend the usefulness of their devices, it's not Apple upgrading their hardware without concern about third-party hacks. It's deliberate.
John Gruber of Daring Fireball really hit the nail on the head when he blogged about this a year ago..
Seriously folks. This is simple. If you do unsupported things, expect those things to be unsupported. It really doesn't matter how popular those unsupported things are. They're still unsupported.
You miss the point. The issue is not that Apple fails to support unsupported hacks, it's that they deliberately turn them off.



Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote
