[quote name='distortedloop']
>
richcon said:
>
> Actually that's a misconception, mostly pushed by business leaders and politicians who already have an anti-union bone to pick. Workers aren't paid nearly as much as some politicians have claimed (and newspapers have reported).
Spoken like a union member.
I'm not a union member. :) I'm just looking at the situation through impartial eyes, using the best information I have available.
Quote
I did not quote the $75 per hour figure. My father-in-law worked for GM as an assembly line worker for 30+ years. His next door neighbor a similar amount of time. I am well aware of what their salaries and benefits were, and what they say actually did all night long at work. Granted, things may have changed in the last ten years since his retirement.
Nor did I say you did. That number's been bounced around, I was just pointing out that the numbers people are quoting in the news are inflated.
Of course, companies should be allowed to demand a high level of performance out of their workers, union or not.
Quote
I have dealt with three different unions in my industry in the last 25 years. Trust me, they are no boon to any company. It's little coincidence that the only airline in the US to consistently remain profitable over the years is the one that isn't unionized.
Nothing I wrote was meant to be a defense of unions in general. There are examples of times unions acting against their own interest, such as the San Francisco Longshoreman's Union that protested mechanizing the city's port, causing the shipping industry to move to Oakland and its more technology-friendly workers.
My point is only that the problems in Detroit are not located in its unions. Sure, there are costs that can be saved by cutting benefits -- but the cost of American-made cars isn't the issue. American-made cars are already cheaper than imports. People just don't want to buy American-made cars anymore, not with gas prices where they've been.
If the unions really did insist on a contract with no accountability, where management can't enforce anything or fire anyone, then the Big Three should have simply told them to go screw their collective selves. Union contracts don't mean anything if the company refuses to sign them. If you're right and the Detroit simply caved to union pressure, that's on them. But I suspect there's more at play here than that.
By the way, I'm a personal fan of Southwest Airlines (who I assume you're referring to). Fly 'em next week, in fact.
Quote
We're really getting off topic though. Are you really trying to suggest that Steve Jobs could turn around the auto industry....?
Who knows? This is an "alternate reality" article anyway.