Apple releases iTunes 8.1 update
#46
Posted 12 March 2009 - 11:00 AM
bq. You have some music playing, you fancy the next track to be 'such and such' so in my mind clicking it or hold clicking it should stack it up ready to be played next.
Yes, you can do that with Party Shuffle/iTunes DJ. Ctrl-click (or right-click) on the song (or selected songs) and choose "Play Next in iTunes DJ".
Yes, you can do that with Party Shuffle/iTunes DJ. Ctrl-click (or right-click) on the song (or selected songs) and choose "Play Next in iTunes DJ".
#47
Posted 12 March 2009 - 11:11 AM
[quote name='context']
>
Yes Hierarchical filing is now obsolete. It joined the horse and buggy.
There's no reason to use the system folder/file structure to organize your music.
It sounds like if you want to organize your music in a folder/file structure then you need to look elsewhere. When you have lemons make lemonade. When in Rome do as the Romans do. If you have a square peg don't try and cram it into a round hole.
>
stilist said:
> >> ITunes sorts and organizes fine. It seems like some complaints are more about it not using the system file structure to sort and organize.
> >
> > How many song files does iTunes organize and sort for you? How many subfolders do you have in your iTunes music folder? Don't you think that iTunes should offer some options -- like organizing the song files by genre subfolders in the Music folder -- which don't necessitate having 1,400 subfolders (and growing) in the Music folder? The iTunes teams seems to have always had a problem with the concept of hierarchy.{quote}
>
> For several years, I managed my library's structure by hand. Somewhere around 10,000 items, I admitted to myself that I had lost control over my system--so I switched over to letting iTunes manage everything.
>
> My library is now significantly larger; my Music folder has 7,857 folders in the root level (artificially inflated by 200-500 due to incorrect tags).
>
> I hardly ever have to care about the fact that I'm working with actual files, and it frees me to invest my time in tagging instead of file management.
Do you find it pleasant, when need be, to scroll down nearly 8,000 folders? Is that the optimal way for a root folder to be "organized"? Was the Hierarchical Filing System created for a good reason? Is hierarchical filing now obsolete? Is there some problem with iTunes allowing a user to elect to organize those files by genre?
> >
> > How many song files does iTunes organize and sort for you? How many subfolders do you have in your iTunes music folder? Don't you think that iTunes should offer some options -- like organizing the song files by genre subfolders in the Music folder -- which don't necessitate having 1,400 subfolders (and growing) in the Music folder? The iTunes teams seems to have always had a problem with the concept of hierarchy.{quote}
>
> For several years, I managed my library's structure by hand. Somewhere around 10,000 items, I admitted to myself that I had lost control over my system--so I switched over to letting iTunes manage everything.
>
> My library is now significantly larger; my Music folder has 7,857 folders in the root level (artificially inflated by 200-500 due to incorrect tags).
>
> I hardly ever have to care about the fact that I'm working with actual files, and it frees me to invest my time in tagging instead of file management.
Do you find it pleasant, when need be, to scroll down nearly 8,000 folders? Is that the optimal way for a root folder to be "organized"? Was the Hierarchical Filing System created for a good reason? Is hierarchical filing now obsolete? Is there some problem with iTunes allowing a user to elect to organize those files by genre?
Yes Hierarchical filing is now obsolete. It joined the horse and buggy.
There's no reason to use the system folder/file structure to organize your music.
It sounds like if you want to organize your music in a folder/file structure then you need to look elsewhere. When you have lemons make lemonade. When in Rome do as the Romans do. If you have a square peg don't try and cram it into a round hole.
#50
Posted 12 March 2009 - 02:52 PM
As I sit here listening to my iPod on shuffle, I find myself supremely annoyed that Apple STILL has not done anything (as far as I can tell) to alleviate or fix the damage done by taking away the Smart Shuffle slider in the "upgrade" to iTunes 8. I always had it set at "least likely," but after switching from 7 to 8, my iPod most definitely is stuck in more of a "more likely" mode -- with no way at all (to the best of my knowledge) to change this. What's the point of shuffling songs, if you're going to hear two songs -- out of thousands -- off the same album back-to-back? It happened minutes ago, once again. So annoyed.
#52
Posted 12 March 2009 - 03:44 PM
trip1ex said:
Yes Hierarchical filing is now obsolete. It joined the horse and buggy.
There's no reason to use the system folder/file structure to organize your music.
It sounds like if you want to organize your music in a folder/file structure then you need to look elsewhere. When you have lemons make lemonade. When in Rome do as the Romans do. If you have a square peg don't try and cram it into a round hole.
There's no reason to use the system folder/file structure to organize your music.
It sounds like if you want to organize your music in a folder/file structure then you need to look elsewhere. When you have lemons make lemonade. When in Rome do as the Romans do. If you have a square peg don't try and cram it into a round hole.
This is as airtight an argument against innovation and improvement as I've encountered.
#54
Posted 12 March 2009 - 03:57 PM
rynosoft said:
bq. You have some music playing, you fancy the next track to be 'such and such' so in my mind clicking it or hold clicking it should stack it up ready to be played next.
Yes, you can do that with Party Shuffle/iTunes DJ. Ctrl-click (or right-click) on the song (or selected songs) and choose "Play Next in iTunes DJ".
Yes, you can do that with Party Shuffle/iTunes DJ. Ctrl-click (or right-click) on the song (or selected songs) and choose "Play Next in iTunes DJ".
Fantastic. I appreciate the correction.
#55
Posted 12 March 2009 - 04:23 PM
sleepymonk, I'm with you. I hate that Apple removed the once much-touted Smart Shuffle feature from iTunes. Steve Jobs made a big deal of this feature at the time of its release, yet you and I are apparently the only ones who used it. :) However, I've found that when I set up a playlist to shuffle within iTunes, the resulting list comes out as if "least likely" was still set in Smart Shuffle?songs by the same artist don't play back to back (whether that is now the default mode or whether I have a hidden preference set somehow, I don't know). The problem happens when you move that playlist to another device?iPod, iPhone, AppleTV. When you shuffle the playlist, it seems, anywhere outside of iTunes, it often plays the same artist back to back. So I "pre-shuffle" the playlists in iTunes: I create the playlist within iTunes and turn on shuffle for that playlist. Then I transfer that shuffled playlist to my player (iPod, iPhone, AppleTV) and play that playlist unshuffled. Counterintuitively, by turning shuffle off, I get a playlist that is more shuffled, less likely to play the same artist or album back to back.
#56
Posted 12 March 2009 - 04:30 PM
"The shuffle settings in iTunes had zero impact on the iPod."
No disrespect, but I'm not convinced this is the case. Maybe it has to do with having an older model (fourth-gen). I never really noticed the "bad" shuffling on my iPod before switching to iTunes 8 last fall, but now I notice it nearly every day.
No disrespect, but I'm not convinced this is the case. Maybe it has to do with having an older model (fourth-gen). I never really noticed the "bad" shuffling on my iPod before switching to iTunes 8 last fall, but now I notice it nearly every day.



Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote