Macworld Forums: Data transfer rates to jump with Bluetooth 3.0 - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Data transfer rates to jump with Bluetooth 3.0

#1 User is offline   Macworld Icon

  • Story Poster
  • Icon
  • Group: MW Bot
  • Posts: 12,827
  • Joined: 30-November 07

Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:20 AM

Post your comments for Data transfer rates to jump with Bluetooth 3.0 here
0

#2 User is online   Filburt Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 276
  • Joined: 16-July 01

Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:53 AM

One of my favorite Bluetooth features is frequency hopping. Wi-Fi, as far as I am aware, still lacks this feature to this date. How would WiFi radio affect frequency hopping in Bluetooth 3.0?
0

#3 User is offline   reallycrazy Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 134
  • Joined: 29-December 08

Posted 21 April 2009 - 12:12 PM

What they need to focus on more is the marketing side of BlueTooth. There are all kinds of devices that are BlueTooth-enabled, but it is exceedingly difficult to figure out which parts of the BlueTooth spec it actually supports. And it's worse for cell-phones, because you can't even count on what the manufacturer says the phone supports, because the wireless-provider you buy the phone from may have arbitrarily disabled some or all of the devices BlueTooth capabilities.
0

#4 User is offline   hmurchison Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 525
  • Joined: 29-April 04

Posted 21 April 2009 - 01:51 PM

+1 reallycrazy says it all.

Bluetooth is a huge disappointment to me. I expected a lot more out of it than simple cordless headsets and speakerphones.

I need to know that when I see that Bluetooth logo I'm getting a certain amount of functionality and to date they have not provided that. I shouldn't have to go digging into the manual to find out that the phone I just bought doesn't sync contacts with the Bluetooth in my navigation system because of unsupported features.

Fool me once...
0

#5 User is offline   samrod Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 441
  • Joined: 31-August 04

Posted 21 April 2009 - 02:27 PM

"Although the high-speed radio itself can be more taxing on a battery than the classic Bluetooth radio, the high-speed radio is also able to send data faster and can therefore be in use for a shorter period of time," Foley said.
But how power does it consume in standby or discovery mode, when it's not transferring data? Most cell phone users leave their BlueTooth enabled without ever using it or even knowing what it's for. What are the wattage, range and frequency specs on BT3.0 compared to BT2.1? The article mentions better disruption handling, how about error checking and security?
just curious,
samrod
0

#6 User is offline   folklore Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 739
  • Joined: 09-August 05

Posted 21 April 2009 - 03:46 PM

Are existing Bluetooth devices firmware-upgradable to v3.0?
0

#7 User is offline   Loren Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: 28-July 01

Posted 21 April 2009 - 11:24 PM

I'm ready for wireless video. Where's the wireless video?
0

#8 User is offline   hayesk Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 976
  • Joined: 07-August 04

Posted 22 April 2009 - 05:10 AM

Loren said:

I'm ready for wireless video. Where's the wireless video?


If the bandwidth spec is true, it will come. But there are plenty of Wi-Fi devices that can play video. Why is it important that Bluetooth have it?
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users