Macworld Forums: mozilla - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

mozilla

#1 User is offline   Nobody Icon

  • Power User
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 58,347
  • Joined: 18-October 07

Posted 16 January 2004 - 10:10 AM

is the web browser in mozilla 1.6 the same as firebird 0.7?
Phil
0

#2 User is offline   d00d Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Mac User
  • Posts: 12,149
  • Joined: 24-April 01

Posted 16 January 2004 - 10:24 AM

No. Firebird is a different browser from Mozilla. Do they use the same engine? They both use Gecko, but the Firebird 0.7 milestone build uses a different (older) version than Mozila 1.6 (which was built only a little while ago). Will you notice a difference in the rendering engine? Probably not unless you visit some really complicated web sites. Is the user experience different? Definitely. Firebird is much more compact, with support for extensions. Mozilla is the suite package.

#3 User is offline   Nobody Icon

  • Power User
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 58,347
  • Joined: 18-October 07

Posted 16 January 2004 - 10:34 AM

thanks d00d.
In reply to:

Firebird is much more compact, with support for extensions. Mozilla is the suite package.



what do you mean by compact. faster? I am only interested in a browser, nothing else, so is firebird a better choice?
Phil
0

#4 User is offline   d00d Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Mac User
  • Posts: 12,149
  • Joined: 24-April 01

Posted 16 January 2004 - 11:07 AM

If you're only interested in the browser, then Firebird is the choice for you. It tends to be faster than Mozilla (both interface and rendering speed). A Firebird 0.8 release should be released soon because according their roadmap, they will be relasing milestones around the same time as Mozilla. You can also get a nightly if you want something more recent.

#5 User is offline   DPG4450Guy Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,131
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 16 January 2004 - 11:56 AM

If I can chime(ra) in here - since you are on X I would recommend CAMINO over the other Mozilla Org gekko engine'd browsers. Built using Cocoa and it flies. Been my finding that it renders pages faster than Mozilla 1.6 or M-Firebird. It also seems to play with Java better. If you want the sidebar for bookmarks,
use version 0.7 Build ID: 2003030613
Fully works with Flash, Shockwave, QT, WMP, and Real plug-ins
ftp://ftp.mozilla.or...amino/releases/
And the sweetest thing about it is - it is Mac OS X only. /forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif
0

#6 User is offline   d00d Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Mac User
  • Posts: 12,149
  • Joined: 24-April 01

Posted 16 January 2004 - 12:02 PM

Camino's pretty good, but I'd recommend a current nightly version of it. They've added a new download manager that's great as well as some other features. The current milestone is a little dated.

#7 User is offline   DPG4450Guy Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,131
  • Joined: 14-September 03

Posted 16 January 2004 - 12:46 PM

true, but no bookmarks sidebar!!!
Drives me nuts.
0

#8 User is offline   dcipjr Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,197
  • Joined: 09-January 01

Posted 16 January 2004 - 03:35 PM

Firebird for Windows is my default browser on my PC. It's far better than IE in terms of speed and functionality--I no longer can live without a pop-up blocker, Google bar, or tabbed browsing.
The interface is clean, responsive, and the browser (even in 0.7 form) crashes less than IE for Windows.
I still prefer Safari on my Mac, since I like the progress bar in the address bar, and I like the interface better in Safari; but that being said, I really do like Firebird.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users