Phil Schiller, analysts discuss the iMac G5
#1
Posted 01 September 2004 - 07:30 AM
#2
Posted 01 September 2004 - 08:01 AM
Not until the ipod came out did my father give Apple much credit even though i've been raving about them from the get go. He now has 2 ipods 1st and 2nd gen and is about to buy a mini. And because of those and that he has seen my new PowerBook he decided to buy one as well (of course faster than mine and not refurbed).
If it wasn't for the ipod Apple wouldn't be getting the recognition they are getting today. I believe using the ipod as a marketing agent to help boost computer sales is a great idea. And the new iMac goes hand in hand with that sell.
#3
Posted 01 September 2004 - 08:37 AM
[...] some analysts suggested the new iMac could be priced too high to become another hit.
"We've moved forward on the market by six years, and I would have liked to see a lower price point," said Roger Kay, a senior analyst with global IT consultancy IDC.
"I also don't know if an all-in-one has the same punch that it did in 1998," he added. "I'm not sure it will be a slam dunk."
Mr. Kay may not be the most knowlegable analyst with regards to Apple's strategy, but he was widely quoted. The above appeared on the websites of New York Times and CNN, among others.
#4
Posted 01 September 2004 - 08:42 AM
Overall, I like this new incarnation of the iMac. The only thing that it needs is FW800 and it WOULD be a slam dunk. As it is, I'm considering getting one for my mom for Christmas.
#5
Posted 01 September 2004 - 09:04 AM
#7
Posted 01 September 2004 - 09:59 AM
If he can do that, maybe he can return Apple to its Apple ][ design roots and create a computer that's fully contained inside the keyboard.
Here's an example of how the PC world does it.
[image]http://www.cybernetm...pcPortView.jpg+
I'm sure Apple could create something much sleeker and more elegant.
What this gives you is the ability to keep your monitor, have a choice of monitor, and have the oft-requested "headless" iMac, and yet still do something cool, innovative-seeming, and true to Apple's heritage.
#9
Posted 01 September 2004 - 10:59 AM
A lot of people have legitimate concerns that when the computer becomes outdated, you have throw out a perfectly good monitor because they can't be separated. A possible solution to this would be to put an additional DVI input on the iMac, allowing it to be used as a monitor for a different computer. How about a built-in KVM switch so you could also use the same keyboard and mouse to control the other computer?
If iMac has a DVI input, it would be compelling to get a 17-inch iMac ($1299) or 20-inch iMac ($1899) instead of 20-inch Cinema Display ($1299) for expanding PowerBook's viewing area. I am sure a lot of PowerBook users will consider getting an iMac instead if that was the case (especially if Xgrid becomes more mainstream).
#10
Posted 01 September 2004 - 11:14 AM
The iMac is a CONSUMER MACHINE.
The iMac is not a PROFESSIONAL MACHINE.
There has to be a difference in the products. Don't try to make an iMac into a PowerMac! If the iMac doesn't have all the bells and whistles that you require: UPGRADE TO THE POWERMAC.
You have a choice!
#11
Posted 01 September 2004 - 12:22 PM
The iMac is a CONSUMER MACHINE.
The iMac is not a PROFESSIONAL MACHINE.
There has to be a difference in the products. Don't try to make an iMac into a PowerMac! If the iMac doesn't have all the bells and whistles that you require: UPGRADE TO THE POWERMAC.
You cannot use PowerMac as a monitor. iMac's LCD, once its "computer" portion become obsolete, will become useless. If the LCD is usable independently, however, it becomes far more compelling buy (at least psychologically).
#12
Posted 01 September 2004 - 12:42 PM
#14
Posted 01 September 2004 - 01:52 PM
http://www.macworld....2004/06/01/ati/
People have been saying if you want high end upgradability then get a "Professional" model. Apple markets Powerbooks as "Professional" laptops but they have neither of these features.



Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote