why?
on my older g3's, 9.1 is a more bug/problem/conflict free system than 9.2.2
my question is..
what does 9.2.2 give you that 9.1 doesn't?
this is for machines NOT running X.x
just really curious.
m
Page 1 of 1
9.1 vs 9.2.2
#2
Posted 21 November 2004 - 06:27 PM
The two OS's are remarkably similar. 9.2.2 is intended to provide better integration with "Classic" mode in OS X. It also provides better compatibility with some newer technologies than 9.1.
I use both, 9.1 being used on a computer that cannot install 9.2.2 without resorting to OS 9 Forever's installer hack.
Of the two, I believe 9.1 is more stable. But bear in mind that the computer on which it's installed does not use USB or FireWire devices.
Hope this helps.
I use both, 9.1 being used on a computer that cannot install 9.2.2 without resorting to OS 9 Forever's installer hack.
Of the two, I believe 9.1 is more stable. But bear in mind that the computer on which it's installed does not use USB or FireWire devices.
Hope this helps.
#3
Posted 22 November 2004 - 09:55 AM
The additional (.1) that takes OS 9.2.1 up to 9.2.2
is only necessary relative to Finder compatibility with OS 10 when running nine in Classic mode; i.e., having 9 and 10 in the same machine.
I've used 9.1 in a 9500 for a long time and it feels like one of my classic vehicles that I know inside and out and so I have no inclination nor need
to move to 9.2.1.
But like the previous poster pointed out, OS 9 Forever would let me update
if I chose to.
Cheers,
Terry
is only necessary relative to Finder compatibility with OS 10 when running nine in Classic mode; i.e., having 9 and 10 in the same machine.
I've used 9.1 in a 9500 for a long time and it feels like one of my classic vehicles that I know inside and out and so I have no inclination nor need
to move to 9.2.1.
But like the previous poster pointed out, OS 9 Forever would let me update
if I chose to.
Cheers,
Terry
Page 1 of 1



Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote