Posted 22 April 2005 - 05:25 AM
I'm only posting because I am disgusted by the whining I see and the underlying satisfaction with Adobe.
I see no monumental differneces between CS1 & CS2, certainly not any worth $800 some dollars. CS2 is more likely a ploy to further their efforts to prevent piracy and stiffle fair use, and to have the user pay for it, than to serve the end user.
Now... had they gone beyond carbonization with these updates, that would be a different story. I'm kind of dissatisfied with Adobe right now.... They stopped at carbonization! Their primary goal should be a release of Photoshop that is native to the new Mac OS environment... which would increase integration far better than any of their transparent motivations and new "integration" apps. Coinciding Photoshop as a native release, they should have a native version of Acrobat. In fact... Acrobat should have been native years ago. OS X is using display PostScript! I, for one, never use Acrobat unless I have to; I use Apple's Preview. Adobe has no excuse, yet still I see the little Classic wrist watch clock whenever I get ahead of their apps, which is invariably. They are merely riding the coat-tails of the new faster processors to parse through the junk code they've left in for God knows how many releases of their software. This is the same crap they pulled with PageMaker in the early 90's... "just leave that junk code in there... we don't have time to make these apps efficient, we just want money!"
My advice: stop the madness... as the end user, don't upgrade, and TELL Adobe to rewrite their applications from the bottom up, if necessary, to get them native in the environment that matters most! Don't sit an whine about having just purchased CS1 and now there is an expensive update... you don't need it! They haven't added any functionality, in fact, they added just a bunch of hoops for you to jump through just so you can use the software that you own and have the right to use!