The Mozilla Foundation has created a commercial subsidiary to handle the money it makes. more
Page 1 of 1
Mozilla creates money-making subsidiary
#3
Posted 03 August 2005 - 07:51 AM
In this case I would disagree. Like they said (which makes perfect sense) for tax reasons and such, it makes more sense to make commerical liscensing deals with a commercial company. As long as all of the proceeds still go into the development and support of their open source projects I see nothing wrong with this.
#5
Posted 03 August 2005 - 10:47 AM
I think this will be a good thing, as the organization needs money to compete with the monied interests of Micro$oft, Apple/WebCore, etc. However, I do know from my political activities that money can destroy a great organization, so I hope that won't happen.
As for:
"There are no plans to introduce any new, paid services to make additional money for Mozilla, Nitot said."
I wouldn't mind some paid services and/or advertising, if it helps spread Mozilla's browsers, and break up M$'s browser monopoly.
I think the main thing here is that M$'s proprietary browser holds about 90% market share, and I'd like to see that spread out more with browsers that use all open standards.
As for:
"There are no plans to introduce any new, paid services to make additional money for Mozilla, Nitot said."
I wouldn't mind some paid services and/or advertising, if it helps spread Mozilla's browsers, and break up M$'s browser monopoly.
I think the main thing here is that M$'s proprietary browser holds about 90% market share, and I'd like to see that spread out more with browsers that use all open standards.
#6
Posted 03 August 2005 - 11:57 AM
As a web developer I have this impossible dream that no sappy movie can convince me will come true, MS saying forget spending development money on IE and let's license the Gecko engine for our browser...
Ironic how Netscape use to be the hideous headache browser for web development, but out of its ashes, the opposite is now true.
Ironic how Netscape use to be the hideous headache browser for web development, but out of its ashes, the opposite is now true.
#8
Posted 03 August 2005 - 02:24 PM
In reply to:
As long as all of the proceeds still go into the development and support of their open source projects I see nothing wrong with this.
As long as all of the proceeds still go into the development and support of their open source projects I see nothing wrong with this.
So if they actually were in it for the money and figured out a way to get rich off this, there'd be something wrong with tha? Gee, Apple's in it for the money, and gets rich of selling software. Those bastards!
#10
Posted 04 August 2005 - 02:26 AM
I agree, the real story is the Phoenix nature of Netscape/Mozilla. Up from the ashes, indeed, kicking butt and taking names. The stuff of which legends are made. Hopefully, by the time Longhorn/Windows Vista provides a decent version of Internet Explorer, Firefox will have something like 25% of the browser market - and Safari will have another 10%. It could happen: Apple's market share in computers is finally rising again.
Page 1 of 1



Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote