Re: Apple unveils 2.0GHz MacBook
#4
Posted 16 May 2006 - 04:55 AM
This pretty much sucks. You HAVE to buy the top end model to get it in black. What were they thinking??? I love it that it comes in black but I don't want to drop $1,500.00 on a new system. Apple has done it again, handed us some candy and punched us in the stomach at the same time.
Thanks for nothing ...
/forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif
Thanks for nothing ...
/forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif
#7
Posted 16 May 2006 - 04:58 AM
Isn't that the same speed as the MacBook Pro?
What do they means by "a 13.3-inch glossy widescreen display thats 79% brighter with 30% more viewing area than the iBook before it"? Which iBook before it?
It's got audio-in, and FireWire, but it's not as pretty as the MBP: the infra-red sensor's too far to the right, and the things which stop the screen bumping on the keyboard look totally uninspired.
What do they means by "a 13.3-inch glossy widescreen display thats 79% brighter with 30% more viewing area than the iBook before it"? Which iBook before it?
It's got audio-in, and FireWire, but it's not as pretty as the MBP: the infra-red sensor's too far to the right, and the things which stop the screen bumping on the keyboard look totally uninspired.
#9
Posted 16 May 2006 - 05:06 AM
It's what was expected - though the screen resolution shows the rumour sites were FOS - but it is heavier than my 12" AlBook. That's not exactly improvement for a sub-notebook. Waiting to see what the Civ 4 specs are before getting upset about Intel graphics (though 64MB is on the low side).
While most of the boxes I was looking for can be ticked, somehow after all the sepculation it isn't as sexy as I was hoping for. I may get one anyway, but I'm not rushing to the Apple Store today. An aluminium-clad thin 13" widescreen MacBook (Pro or otherwise) with a 128MB graphics card would have got my purchase today.
While most of the boxes I was looking for can be ticked, somehow after all the sepculation it isn't as sexy as I was hoping for. I may get one anyway, but I'm not rushing to the Apple Store today. An aluminium-clad thin 13" widescreen MacBook (Pro or otherwise) with a 128MB graphics card would have got my purchase today.
#10
Posted 16 May 2006 - 05:09 AM
In reply to:
This pretty much sucks. You HAVE to buy the top end model to get it in black. What were they thinking??? I love it that it comes in black but I don't want to drop $1,500.00 on a new system. Apple has done it again, handed us some candy and punched us in the stomach at the same time.
While I think you're being a little over the top, $200 for 20 GB and black coloring seems a little foolish. People will still buy it, but Apple has clearly recognized the overwhelming consumer demand for black over white. This pretty much sucks. You HAVE to buy the top end model to get it in black. What were they thinking??? I love it that it comes in black but I don't want to drop $1,500.00 on a new system. Apple has done it again, handed us some candy and punched us in the stomach at the same time.
EDIT: Furthermore, the 80 GB drive is a $50 option for the white top end MacBook. That's a whopping $150 for coloring only. Boo.
#13 Guest__*
Posted 16 May 2006 - 05:16 AM
Buy or do not buy, but please quit the whining. There is more important stuff going on in the World than whether the low end MacBook comes in black.
In reply to:
This pretty much sucks. You HAVE to buy the top end model to get it in black. What were they thinking??? I love it that it comes in black but I don't want to drop $1,500.00 on a new system. Apple has done it again, handed us some candy and punched us in the stomach at the same time. Thanks for nothing ...
This pretty much sucks. You HAVE to buy the top end model to get it in black. What were they thinking??? I love it that it comes in black but I don't want to drop $1,500.00 on a new system. Apple has done it again, handed us some candy and punched us in the stomach at the same time. Thanks for nothing ...



Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote
