Macworld Forums: Microsoft makes a Basic mistake with Office 2007 - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

  • (12 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Microsoft makes a Basic mistake with Office 2007

#155 User is offline   Peter Cohen Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,646
  • Joined: 05-February 03

Posted 19 July 2007 - 01:59 PM

Quote:

They kept it up just long enough not to look like "the bad guys" for not trying.


I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids!
0

#156 User is offline   KnotGullible Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 18
  • Joined: 09-December 06

Posted 19 August 2007 - 06:03 PM

It only took nine months for my prediction to come true!
0

#157 User is offline   griffman Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 8,604
  • Joined: 09-January 01

Posted 19 August 2007 - 06:39 PM

Well, mostly true /forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif. We can't write those formats, only read them. Still, not a bad hit ratio!
-rob.

#158 User is offline   lispwiz Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 16-January 09

Posted 16 January 2009 - 02:40 PM

Re: Microsoft makes a Basic mistake with Office 2007
I am a Windows and beginning Linux user, not a Mac user. However, Microsoft is giving users of Office 2007 for Windows a similar shaft. Microsoft claims that they are supporting VBA, but damned if I can get Excel 2003 macros to run in Excel 2007. And as for telling the user what is specifically wrong with the code... forget it! Maybe it's time to dump Microsoft and call the company what it should be called: Microshit.
0

  • (12 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users