Macworld Forums: Apple unveils iPhone - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

  • (9 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Apple unveils iPhone

#99 User is online   BJWanlund Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 45
  • Joined: 07-August 06

Posted 10 January 2007 - 01:25 PM

I don't think you guys need to b about Cingular. While their network might not be the best, it's still better than Verizon's by a long shot. Plus, I'd been looking at getting a Blackberry, but now that I can get a Blackberry-like device from Apple, AND it's a widescreen iPod, I might be able to swing it.
BJ
0

#100 User is online   DJRizzo Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63
  • Joined: 18-November 05

Posted 10 January 2007 - 02:11 PM

Here's a curiosity: Will the iPhone be able to use external monitors? I ask because on the Amazon page for the 8GB iPhone under "Accessories" it lists "Compatible Monitors." Check out the page here.
Probably just an Amazon automated marketing thing and not really related. However, speaking of accessories I can't wait to see what comes out for it.
0

#101 User is offline   montgomery_burns Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,060
  • Joined: 31-August 04

Posted 10 January 2007 - 04:10 PM

I wonder why Steve only compared the iPhone to more limited devices such as the Motorola Q and Blackberry, neither of which have touch screens. And while the Palm Treo has received many good reviews, the screen is not as big as some of the other Windows Mobile devices. A more suitable comparison would be with something like the UTStarcom XV6700 which is available from both Sprint and Verizon.
0

#102 User is offline   radnuf Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 231
  • Joined: 03-October 06

Posted 10 January 2007 - 05:32 PM

If this is good for Apple then it is good for Cingular. Wonder who's buying Cingular stock? /forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
0

#103 User is offline   AppleCoder Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 60
  • Joined: 10-May 04

Posted 10 January 2007 - 05:55 PM

I already have it, was going to change to nextel, but this is what the NEWTON was suppose to be way back then. They envisioned it, just not the right time.
Now these portable devices are cool, the hottest thing, and everyone is making them and buying them up. Did not work in the 90's. Hey fail once, try it again.
0

#104 User is offline   JohnEarnhardt Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 10-January 07

Posted 10 January 2007 - 06:54 PM

UPDATE ON CISCO'S iPHONE TRADEMARK - Intellectual property is the lifeblood of Silicon Valley and we all have to protect our property. As most are likely aware, the iPhone trademark is owned by Cisco. We (Cisco) had hoped to reach an agreement to share our trademark with Apple, yet they decided to use the name without our agreement, so we, unfortunately, are having to go to court to stop them from using the name. It is not about money. We still hope we can reach an agreement, but when your neighbor steals your property, you have no recourse other than to call the cops and file a complaint. Full Cisco statement at: http://newsroom.cisc...orp_011007.html
0

#105 User is online   lhudd Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 369
  • Joined: 16-November 04

Posted 10 January 2007 - 06:56 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Only in the US do they "Lock" phones to a particular GSM carrier.


Eh? What makes you think this? Here in the UK, if you buy a subsidized mobile it'll be locked to the provider's network; no switching SIMs to a different provider. Though you can legally pay to get it unlocked when your contract expires.


I said i'd be willing to pay 800 for an unlocked phone. What you have proposed is $800 for a locked phone.
0

#106 User is offline   Philip Michaels Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 909
  • Joined: 14-December 00

Posted 10 January 2007 - 06:58 PM

Quote:

UPDATE ON CISCO'S iPHONE TRADEMARK


More coverage here

#107 User is offline   budmac07 Icon

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 10-January 07

Posted 10 January 2007 - 07:52 PM

Sure, that's a 2 year deal for the contract and phone services, having said that, the 2 year deal DOES NOT INCLUDE THE UNLIMITED EDGE NETWORK, THAT COSTS AN ADDITIONAL $49.95 PER MONTH! IT'S $15 WITH T-MOBILE AND $19 WITH VERIZON.
GET WITH IT CINGULAR, $49.95 PER MONTH, GET SERIOUS! /forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif
0

#108 User is online   UlfDahlen Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 31
  • Joined: 28-July 06

Posted 10 January 2007 - 08:28 PM

Very nice, I'll probably buy one, BUT: I came to Macworld Expo for MAC NEWS! What is this Expo turning into? iPhoneworld? iPodworld? I HATE IT!
It's even worse, I understand Apple has many Mac-related updates in the pipeline, but are not introducing them here and now, presumably so that iPhone gets all the attention. BUT IT'S CALLED MACWORLD! I WANT MAC STUFF, not two zillion more iPod cases and an iPhone I can't even buy now.
Also, what if I want an iPod video with widescreen? Now I have to sign a two year Cingular contract just to look at my movies?
I really don't like this. I think I'll stop traveling to SF for Macworld Expo, since it's not Macworld anymore.
0

#109 User is offline   hillstones Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,229
  • Joined: 18-September 04

Posted 10 January 2007 - 08:32 PM

After watching the keynote, the software on the iPhone is very impressive. However, $599 is still very expensive...didn't work for the iPod Photo either. Maybe when the price gets cut in half over time.
What they need to do is take that sweet widescreen touch display and slap it on the iPod! Hopefully it won't be long for that to happen.
0

#110 User is offline   wgood Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 772
  • Joined: 11-November 04

Posted 10 January 2007 - 08:51 PM

I noticed that Steve did not name a partner or a date for Canada. Any word on Canadian availability?
0

#111 User is offline   MacCheetah3 Icon

  • Power User
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,645
  • Joined: 02-April 01

Posted 10 January 2007 - 10:23 PM

Hi
A little blab about this whole 3G cellular carrier b*h fest.
From what I read -- Sorry, no specific links as I just don't feel like doing a lot of searching right now but feel free to search yourself -- that Verizon isn't popular to upgrading their network and even after purchasing AWS licenses, will still likely take a very long time to implement and they can afford to wait. My point being, WCDMA seems a long way off in the US and therefore, GSM is the largest worldwide standard. I have a WCDMA / GSM phone that was big in Europe, ... ( Nokia 6630 ) and the 3G ( WCDMA, ... ) features will likely do me no good in the foreseeable future here in the States. One must also consider that Cingular customers can also use T-Mobile towers and therefore you can add in their coverage.
Want more proof that 3G phones aren't what they are praised to be on this side of the 'pond'? Look at the Internet [speed] and other technology offering here compared to that of Europe / Aisa / ... Verizon's FIOS service offers a very close value to that but is quite limited to where it is currently offered. Let's face it, we Americans are willing to pay these prices and so companies aren't going to worry about offering better value. Quite annoying but true.
0

#112 User is offline   ljocampo Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 39
  • Joined: 03-February 03

Posted 12 January 2007 - 08:18 PM

I would have liked to see the iPhone named the Apple Phone. Just like they did with the iTV. This phone is a purely Apple revolution in technology. It's brand new. iAnything is getting old. iPhone , to me, doesn't seem cool anymore.
0

  • (9 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users