Macworld Forums: Parallels Desktop RC3 improves Vista support - Macworld Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Parallels Desktop RC3 improves Vista support

#1 User is offline   MW Forums Icon

  • Power User
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12,220
  • Joined: 02-August 04

Posted 16 February 2007 - 06:30 AM

Parallels Desktop for Mac RC3 now features XP to Vista upgrade capabilities, more secure drag and drop and Leopard support. more
0

#2 User is offline   mdawson Icon

  • Veteran
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,803
  • Joined: 31-August 04

Posted 16 February 2007 - 09:45 AM

Uh, did you forget to add a closing URL tag in there, Peter? The article gets a little difficult to read after the first sentence. /forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif
0

#3 User is offline   griffman Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 8,605
  • Joined: 09-January 01

Posted 16 February 2007 - 10:01 AM

That's fixed now.
-rob.

#4 User is offline   pdmarsh Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 58
  • Joined: 27-February 05

Posted 16 February 2007 - 11:57 AM

It would be nice if they could find some way to run Aero graphics, to show off some of the Vista eye-candy with their windows. What's the point otherwise, except to run apps modified to run in bare-bones Vista in the future? XP runs the current apps just fine. Since the point of Parallels is only to run occasional Windows apps, there will be little urgency to upgrade to Vista apps with the older apps meeting the occasional need. With Coherence there's also little reason for the other Vista stuff to be available, since MacOS X's counterpart is perfectly useful.
0

#5 User is offline   NeoX Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 486
  • Joined: 27-August 04

Posted 16 February 2007 - 12:16 PM

Quote:

It would be nice if they could find some way to run Aero graphics, to show off some of the Vista eye-candy with their windows


I hope they do this too, but I doubt we will see it soon. From what I have read, and seen, VMWare has a feature they are testing that allows Direct3D to work in the VM. The demonstration I saw was several Windows 3D games running quite smoothly in the VM. Hopefully Parallels will get this. That sounds like the first step to getting Aero in a VM.
Quote:

Since the point of Parallels is only to run occasional Windows apps,


I think this was true for Virtual PC on PowerPC, but with features like Coherence it seems this is intended for more then occasional use. I use it regularly, nothing occasional about it.
Regards,
0

#6 User is offline   tmedia1 Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 403
  • Joined: 12-October 04

Posted 16 February 2007 - 12:25 PM

Quote:

From what I have read, and seen, VMWare has a feature they are testing that allows Direct3D to work in the VM. The demonstration I saw was several Windows 3D games running quite smoothly in the VM. Hopefully Parallels will get this. That sounds like the first step to getting Aero in a VM.



I'm using Parallels every day and I hope Parallels will fully support graphics cards soon. This is will be a HUGE step forward. Parallels engineers are doing a great job with moving this product forward!
0

#7 User is offline   Nobody Icon

  • Power User
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 58,347
  • Joined: 18-October 07

Posted 16 February 2007 - 01:00 PM

Parallels Desktop is awesome!
Well done!
0

#8 User is offline   bdkennedy1 Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 120
  • Joined: 11-February 04

Posted 16 February 2007 - 04:16 PM

Ummm... I thought release candidates were supposed to be feature complete. And considering RC2 had some major bugs, this should still be in beta.
0

#9 User is offline   d00d Icon

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Mac User
  • Posts: 12,149
  • Joined: 24-April 01

Posted 16 February 2007 - 04:58 PM

Agreed. The last "Release Candidate" hosed my Boot Camp install. RCs shouldn't have glaring bugs like that left.

#10 User is offline   zwei Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 221
  • Joined: 05-February 07

Posted 16 February 2007 - 05:27 PM

I decided to stop using it with my BootCamp partition. I hated having to put in my password every time I tried to launch it. ...it seemed very flakey to me. Although the STANDARD parallels VMs seem to run great. I don't like keeping two windoze installs up to date, but that looks like what I'll be doing for the near future at least.
0

#11 User is offline   MacGeek1955 Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 278
  • Joined: 28-November 05

Posted 17 February 2007 - 01:01 AM

I wouldn't want to be an early adopter of Vista even if I had a Windows machine. I know someone who got a new PC with Vista and is trying to put XP on it. It's not compatible with her wireless router. Vista is not compatible with a lot of things, not just iPods.
Apple, there's no hurry to release Leopard. Just make it right.
0

#12 User is offline   macimmortal Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 40
  • Joined: 12-October 04

Posted 17 February 2007 - 02:41 PM

I totally agree. I just installed RC3 and now it takes 4 minutes to completely boot my Parallels XP Pro VMs. I removed the Parallels tools from XP, re-installed them, but it is still hosed. Any ideas?
0

#13 User is offline   Rhywun Icon

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 893
  • Joined: 01-March 06

Posted 17 February 2007 - 08:31 PM

Quote:

Ummm... I thought release candidates were supposed to be feature complete. And considering RC2 had some major bugs, this should still be in beta.


Yeah, RC2 was unusable for me. Love the product, but I'm sticking with final versions from now on /forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users