Network World: Should Apple secure its iPods?
#2
Posted 18 April 2007 - 02:44 PM
If you need to protect your data, you need to protect your data. The iPod is one of many threats and it makes no sense to ask Apple to secure one possible vector.
#3
Posted 18 April 2007 - 02:56 PM
End of arguement.
It seems to me that securing a company's data is the responsibilty of the company (although if its easy to steal something it still doesn't make it right.) I'm sure someone can write a program that will not allow a external drive (whether its an iPod or not) to mount without an appropriate password.
#4
Posted 18 April 2007 - 03:15 PM
The Apple executives' response?
'iPods can do that?"
/forums/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
#5
Posted 18 April 2007 - 03:25 PM
What happened to individual responsibility and morals? Oh yes. In case no one has noticed, we've been under attack from within since the '40s by an insidious enemy. Religion is now only for old people who are about to die off soon anyway. Too many health care professionals deal more in symptom suppression than in cures. Too many teachers are more like behavior police than educators.
So prescriptions are somehow supposed to replace nutrition? Are second and third mortgages supposed to replace jobs, wages, and savings?
Ah yes, the masses would be easier to control if everyone was sick, poor, and stupid. Hmmm. Police state here we come!!
#6
Posted 18 April 2007 - 03:27 PM
Hey MacWorld, if this is the kind of journalistic thinking that your editors approve of, I'll be more than happy to stop visiting.
#8
Posted 18 April 2007 - 04:03 PM
In Mac OS X, with an Open Directory setup and Macintosh Manager/managed clients, you can set up your clients to not have the privilege of mounting external drives, and even from using CDs/DVDs, but I don't know of many installations outside of a school scenario where that would make much sense. It's kinda like setting up email accounts that can only send and receive email to/from other people in the company (to, y'know, prevent spam). You might be able to do it, but at what cost of productivity for your users?
#9
Posted 18 April 2007 - 04:17 PM
I used to work with a guy a few years ago that listened to Rush Limbaugh all day long at work. Another guy listened to some financial radio shows. 2 people listening to internet radio won't drag down a T-1, but try 100 or 1000. I say let them have their iPods and loosen up about such things. The miniature flash drives and even camera drives can do the same evil things easier than iPods. Besides with Leopard we can use flash memory for increasing productivity.
Besides, why would anyone worry about an iPod as a security problem when most coporations use Windows and to top that off they let execs drive around with millions of credit card numbers on laptops sitting in their cars? I think they need to close some Windows before they start worrying about iPods.
#10
Posted 18 April 2007 - 04:42 PM
Clearly there's an ideal opportunity to write programs to take advantage of this: 1. "Utilizing breakthrough proprietary compression methods, iNab Plus allows you to store tens of thousand more customer records on your iPod -- while still leaving room for your favorite music." Or, 2. "Ease your worries getting past your company's security desk. With just a single click, iCloak turns ANY critical corporate data file into a MP3 or AAC music file to store on your iPod. And, our completely DRM-FREE file format makes them easy to share with friends and family!"
#11
Posted 18 April 2007 - 05:04 PM
#12
Posted 18 April 2007 - 08:08 PM
#13
Posted 19 April 2007 - 10:26 AM
#14
Posted 19 April 2007 - 10:33 AM
Security is impossible when even the people you hire to keep data secure can't be trusted -- doesn't matter whether you keep iPods or any other storage device out, because in the end, data thieves will still be able to march past the gatekeepers with their iPods, since the gatekeepers can be easily bought off.



Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote