Quote:
So to jwharding28, I find it a little disconcerting that your reconsidering an iPhone purchase, on the sole fact that you MIGHT be without it for 3 days, IF you have to replace the battery. Or is it based on principle? (If so, as I've illustrated above, there are a lot of other companies/industries you can boycott based on the same principle, and especially who charge more than $30.) And the probability that you'll turn in your iPhone for battery replacement is less than the probability that you won't.
My cell phone IS my phone. I have no home phone. The only other easy access I have to a phone is out work. Being without my cell phone for 3 days would not be good. I know there are others who have also given up their land lines for just a cell phone (really, why pay for 2 phones?). That's why for some 3 days is unreasonable. Others might be using it for work, for the email access where they have to travel. 3 days is likewise unacceptable in that case.
Great, I can rent a replacement (I'm assuming that's accurate since I haven't actually read anything about that and don't feel like looking). So the cost of replacement goes from $86 to $116 (I'm again assuming the $30 figure you used was the rental fee). $116 for a battery. One more time, $116 for a battery.
Quote:
And to think that Apple could do a battery replacement with same day turnaround is unreasonable. Here's why: I'm assuming that iPhone battery replacement is similar to iPod, where it might actually be a refurbished replacement. Even if not, these things are not easy to take apart and is not a 5-minute job.
Why is it unreasonable? Apple designed the thing. It seems like they should have designed the battery to be easily replaced considering how they estimate battery life to be about a year.
Quote:
To put it in perspective, let's say that Apple DID offer to do it right there and then. It'll probably take between 30 minutes to 1 hr, between them taking apart the phone, replacing the battery, verifying the phone works, the consumer making payment, then doing the paperwork. So you walk into the store and ask, "Can you replace my battery while I wait?" and the reply will be, "Sure, come back in 2 weeks." Why? Because instead of a Genius taking 10 minutes to pack up the phone, do the paperwork, and send it to a shop where they replace batteries en masse, they spend 30 minutes to an hour with each customer. I don't know about you, but I'd rather hear, "we'll have it ready in 3 days," than "we'll have it for you same day. Come back in 2 weeks."
Um, how many people do you think will be bringing in iPhones on a daily basis to have the battery replaced? Again, it goes back to the design issue. Apple should have designed so that both Apple AND AT&T support could have relatively easily replaced the battery. There are plenty of AT&T retailers around that any wave of iPhone battery replacements could be spread out across them (as opposed to all falling on the Apple Stores which aren't very well distributed).
Quote:
So then you think, well then Apple should hire more people. No problem! But who is going to pay for them? Either the cost of the phone goes up, or the battery replacement cost goes up. The money has to come from somewhere.
And $86 for a replacement battery is reasonable? The battery is roughly 20% of the phone's total cost? It's not easy to remove and replace the iPhone battery, you say? Again, that was an Apple design issue that the customer is supposed to deal with. When my Verizon battery died because of moisture damage, I paid all of $15 for the replacement. And it was done while I stood there.