It's the content, stupid
#2
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:36 AM
In this particular case, I feel like Apple TV, at least in its initial incarnation, was the classic solution in search of a problem.
#3
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:39 AM
My keyboard is wireless, and I can take it into the next room and control that media.
So, I have a complete computer that conveniently connects to a TV. What does an Apple TV do that this setup doesn't do?
I suspect that it does less, which is why it was labelled one of the worst products. If it's just the content...........?
#4
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:52 AM
I'd like to see the rentals be more on the NetFlix model, keep 2,3,4----x movies active, the number would depend on the plan you sign up for. In order to watch a new movie you have to have an available "slot" in your account. If you've got them all used, decide which one to deactivate, maybe delete. Once that's done the new movie will play.
If you were looking to only watch iTunes content, I agree that the ATV is a bust, but I've created a bunch of home movies of the kids on the 4th of July for example. Much better watching them on the HD TV than the computer or iPod/iPhone.
Is the ATV perfect, far from it. But like the iPhone, its initial iteration is a good start and it should be upgradable to a large degree via software download/upgraded.
JW
#5
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:57 AM
You know... up to a couple of years ago you have to write "iPod killer" (no matter what the topic was) to get clicks.
Now, "click-wanters" should write something bad about Apple.
And what's bad? The AppleTV, a Steve's hobby, just sold 400k units!
Of course, the iPhone sold 1M in 72 days... so, the AppleTV is a "failure".
I think that this Yahoo's writer would like to have a lot of failures like this!
#6
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:07 AM
Sure, I'd like more choice in movies, but I'd rather see that implemented through a Netflix like rental service (Jan 15?). If you want to see a movie over and over though, why not just buy the DVD on the cheap at Walmart or Target when it comes out and use the method Chris describes.
#7
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:14 AM
Why stream anything and worry about lag and/or broken stream signal? God put hard drives in those Playstation 3 thingys for a reason. Putting 2 dozen episodes of Miffy, Super Why and Word World on the drive has saved time and money. Although my little rat has never put peanut butter on a DVD... hey how did she get a knife to spread it on in the first case? I am guessing it was chunky? Smooth would not have scratched the surface.
#8
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:23 AM
I do get some streaming issues from time to time, but they are rare.
JW
#9
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:24 AM
#10
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:30 AM
The problem is that people misunderstand exactly what the AppleTV is. It's a bridge between iTunes and your TV. That's it. That's why it doesn't have a TV tuner or a DVR or a DVD player or a Blu-Ray player or a milkshake machine built in. Because it's not those things. Tech writers - especially PC-centric writers - seem to want to turn the AppleTV into a completely different device.
If the AppleTV is a failure - and I don't think 400k units sold constitutes failure - then it's a failure of imagination on the part of content owners and Apple to reach mutually agreeable terms for digital distribution of content. I've mentioned before that it'd be great if iTunes could rip DVDs the same way it could rip CDs. I'd even pay $2-5 per disc if it were simple (i.e., easier than HandBrake).
#11
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:38 AM
folklore said:
No, we don't. Really. We're comparing the Apple TV to other products that offer comparable functionality in a similar price range and find it lacking. I'm not expecting it to brown my toast in the morning. I just know I can get a lot more for $300 out of a box that streams video between my computer and my TV.
#12
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:39 AM
I have to agree, Peter. The Xbox 360 with Connect360 is an awesome combination. (had the Xbox about 14 months but didn't even know about Connect360 until a couple of months ago - to me, that's the "huge bonus")
For me to be interested in Apple TV, it needs far more capability. A DVD player, a DVR ... something! $300 to simply suck content from iTunes seems grossly overpriced. Add a DVR aspect that works directly with cable, throw in a DVD player and I'm all over it.
(Yes Chris, I know that's not what ATV is about - but it's what I want.) ;-)
-phil
#14
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:54 AM
I do agree with you that the main reason why the Apple TV didn't catch on with the main stream consumers is because of its dependence on iTunes Store's content. It merely acts as a conduit between the computer and the TV. Yes, even with the movies ripped from DVDs, it still is only as good as its content it plays.
I think if Apple TV could be made to do something more than just playing content, it will be WILDLY successful. I have written an article called "Repurposing the Apple TV" ( http://appletvsource...ntent/view/464/ ) to explore the possibilities of what this device can potentially do. The key is to open up the Apple TV to 3rd party developers. With this, Apple can just outsource a bulk of Apple TV development to other manufacturers. A DVR module, video conferencing module, etc. These are real possibilities for the Apple TV. Only if Apple would let this happen.



Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote
