Get Ready for a crackdown on broadband use
#2
Posted 18 February 2008 - 10:46 AM
"We have enough bandwidth" - "We see no problem"
"There will be a problem" - "We dont want to update".
Hmmm...maybe they see all the different activities and merely see this as a way to create more and more and more money. They admit they dont have an issue and wont...well then they later change their mind.
Its about $$$ and control and lazy...but really about control. Thats why they dont update their systems, why shouldnt they? Its not like the CEOs and other suits are the ones who have to do any actual work.
What a joke, seriously. They dont like bittorrent, yet businesses want to use that to share large legal files...so how will that work? They got bored of the old business model and dont want to be progressive. How am I not surprised.
O.k. Rant over, doesnt matter what my say in this is anyway. lol
peace
#4
Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:13 AM
What started out as a network built on a common framework is now largely browser specific. And now that we've been sold on unlimited broadband access, cariers want to throttle usage and establish tiers. However, trademarks lose their value if not protected. It's hard to take something back once you've given it away in other words. Government should reject such control.
#5
Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:14 AM
Quote
It?s like a postal worker opening every letter and scanning the contents to see whether it?s junk mail, a bill, a love letter, or something else.
No, it's like the postal worker scanning each piece of mail and seeing if it is stamped standard, priority or express mail, and handling it accordingly. Oh wait, this is what they are doing . . .
Tom
#7
Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:25 AM
#8
Posted 18 February 2008 - 11:45 AM
And Comcast, I use your service, and you suck for restricting my access to services. I will pay more for these services. It is none of your business what I do with my internet. I hope you get hung by the broadband cables that you are so attached to.
Oh, and by the way, nice customer service and speed.
#9
Posted 18 February 2008 - 12:09 PM
It is only in a free market that the solutions customers need or want that they'll be made available. Verizon FiOS is in a great position to compete against Comcast. Comcast's limitations as early as in 2004 were the reason I switched to FiOS.
I can see already see the commercials lampooning the likes of Comcast for not keeping up with bandwidth demand.
Dominik Hoffmann
#10
Posted 18 February 2008 - 12:25 PM
I'm eyeballing the new 20MB up and 20MB down service from FiOS... It's a few dollars more, but it could be useful to me. Especially since I have a web site, ftp server, and LDMS Gateway server hosted here at home. I'm even thinking about setting up an email server too... Right now 5MB up does ok, most of the time doing even better than that, but that 20MB up would make thinks sick. Especially since the digital images on my site are not getting any smaller.
Oh, and I did call the Verizon support people a few weeks back to try and see where an issue was. Turns out it was my third party router that was the problem. The tech from Verizon was VERY helpful and we were able to eliminate the router from the mix and confirm that it was the issue (plugged directly into the wall outlet, everything worked properly). I've since received a new router, which is working properly... Alas, Belkin's phone support sucks donkey parts when it comes to actually helping you out. I could smell the curry through the phone, and barely understand the person. The Verizon guy WAS in the US, there was no language barrier to overcome, and he was more than happy to work with me. The Belkin guy had to pass me along to tier 2, which was a call back (not the case when I've needed that from Verizon) and tier 3 was a joke (the message on my machine when I got home was they were only there until 4PM PST, I'm on the east coast, and rarely get home that early).
I've been with Verizon for years (since 2001 for phone, internet since about 2002) and have no issues with their service or support. I jumped onto the FiOS service as soon as I knew about it for my area, and can't go back to either regular DSL or downgrade to cable. When they were able to offer tv in my town, I dumped Comcast (or Con-Cast) so fast it made their heads spin. I actually called them up the day Verizon did the install, so that I didn't have to worry about a gap in service. Of course they want me back, but I'm spending less for better services now...
#11
Posted 18 February 2008 - 12:55 PM
I remember thinking it was odd that they pay by the GB when we have pretty much unlimited capacity, but it makes sense that people using more bandwidth should pay more money than those using less.
#12
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:05 PM
#13
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:25 PM
I think that the US needs to keep the throttling of speeds either to a minimum, or make the limits high enough that people are not hamstrung by it. I do hope that Verizon doesn't go down that road too. Especially with the speed I'm getting. There are weeks that I hit more than 500MB (let alone 500Mb) in a single day. New version of one of the applications I'm the admin of: 800MB download. ISO for another aspect of it: ~400MB download. There are even days that the Windows updates for the systems I have easily exceed 500Mb.
If they're going to cut down on what we can download for amount, then they better increase the speeds to what's available for places in Europe and Asia. Globally speaking, we're on the slower side of the pipe (on average). Or at least for cable ISP's...
#14
Posted 18 February 2008 - 01:29 PM
Thank you. I hope the free market naysayers can learn to appreciate that. Keep the government out, and someone will offer a better deal.
And please, Leftinistos, don't flame with extremes. Internet service is not medical care or air flight. It will be OK.
Of course, maybe HillaryCare or the ObamaNation will provide it to everyone for FREE!!! I mean, why should only the rich have FIOS?.......



Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote