Leopard, four months later
#30
Posted 11 March 2008 - 05:25 PM
RhymingDesigner said:
Quote
Agreed! Here's one I hate: If you click the eject button in the Sidebar for a mounted disk image, the Finder window closes when the disk image is unmounted. Why? All I asked the Finder to do was unmount a volume, not close the current window. Maddening!
#31
Posted 11 March 2008 - 06:05 PM
So what’s different?
* Mac is finally winning in the marketplace
* Mac’s (big bully) competitor has finally produced a true dog in the market place—Vista
* Apple’s non-Mac businesses have grown explosively
* Apple has denied its core business (no pun intended) by dropping “Computer” from its name. Note that GE has maintained reference to its “Electric” roots throughout its huge and successful diversification.
Does this mean that Apple no longer thinks it has to sweat the details in its Mac shop? Has Steve been spreading himself too thin? Has Apple, like Spitzer, strayed from home and gotten into too many things?
#32
Posted 11 March 2008 - 06:07 PM
#33
Posted 11 March 2008 - 06:37 PM
CandyBar is the best fix for the Dock and the terribly bland folder icons. CandyBar can give you a nice smoked glass Dock with the return of the Blue Triangles for open apps. As for folder icons, I used CandyBar to give me back the Tiger folder icons.
Prior to 10.5.2, I wasn't recommending Leopard to any of my friends or family because of the annoying interface issues that were resolved with 10.5.2.
#34
Posted 11 March 2008 - 07:02 PM
Also, I'm not having any problems with Leopard stability on my MB Pro, it's rock solid for me, so those with problems must be dealing with specific issues (customization? Third-party software? Hacks?)
#35
Posted 11 March 2008 - 07:52 PM
For Spaces, I use an iMac, with a Mightly Mouse, and I've mapped Spaces to the squeeze (4th button). In that mode it's pretty wonderful. I pretty much let any app open in any window, and have only set a couple apps to be in a specific Space. I started out with 4 Spaces, but I now use 9. That sounds pretty crazy, but it's great. Squeeze, squeeze, I jump back and forth, good visual feedback, no need to remember what's in which space. Some things, like our server log (tail -f) I can evaluate even in 1/3 size without going to the Space. I don't use Expos?? so much these days because I always have at least one empty Space to jump to where the desktop is cleared out.
#36
Posted 11 March 2008 - 08:19 PM
I will also chime in on the menu bar, I like the transparent. I was actually using a program to make it transparent before leopard came out. I always found it annoying that I would have some of my desktop background cut off by the solid white bar. The transparent bar allows me to see the desktop picture and still be able to use the bar. Thank you Apple for this, now I don't have to use the other 3rd-Party program.
I chimed in earlier about how I liked the spaces and new dock look. But Time Machine needs a little more work. I sometimes get the "Time Machine drive is Read Only" message. But ejecting it and restarting solves the problem, just a little work. But hardly ever backed up before, now I don't have to worry about it.
#38
Posted 11 March 2008 - 08:35 PM
#40
Posted 11 March 2008 - 08:55 PM
#41
Posted 11 March 2008 - 09:12 PM
Along these lines, I think that it would be great if Macworld ALWAYS tested software and hardware about being a good citizen on computers with multiple user accounts and restricted accounts. I am tired of having to use Get Info to tweak Permissions, especially for games, or enter registration keys multiple times on OS X computers that are built from the ground up to support multiple user accounts per computer.
#42
Posted 11 March 2008 - 09:20 PM
spinoza2 said:
Whenever a Macworld staffer makes a negative comment about these UI elements, we get comments like yours here in the forums, so we know there are dissenters ;) This was an article about my personal impressions of Leopard after using the official release for four months.
spinoza2 said:
Apple often makes UI decisions without focus groups and user research. Often those decisions are good ones. But I think the best evidence that this time Apple made some bad design decisions is the fact that 10.5.2 significantly changed some of these UI elements. For example, for the menu bar, Apple essentially reversed course by (1) providing an option to completely disable the semi-transparency; and (2) reducing transparency significantly even when transparency is enabled.
spinoza2 said:
If I don't agree with your opinion on an interface element -- one that violates Apple's own user-interface guidelines -- I'm akin to an IT guy who doesn't understand the benefits of good design to a UI? Au contraire, it's because I understand the benefits of good UI design that I disliked these features ;)



Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote