6 Replies
Last post:
Jan 15, 2005 7:04 AM by
bofus
My exact thoughts. I was interested in a suite that would replace MS Office. Office is fine, but I don't feel like paying 100% price for the 5% of the features I would use.
Pages looks interesting and Keynote is probably very useful for those that do presentations, but no spreadsheet program, however simple, makes this a rather half-baked "suite".
Pages looks interesting and Keynote is probably very useful for those that do presentations, but no spreadsheet program, however simple, makes this a rather half-baked "suite".
There are also free stand-alone spreadsheets available through version tracker...I think the idea behind iWork was not to develope an all-around suite, but to have a top notch word processor that incorporates graphics and templates that can easily be exported to Keynote for presentations.
I think a lot of people misunderestimate what a huge market that is - people who need nothing but graphics, word processing, and presentation software. I know that the secretaries in our office never use spreadsheets, only Word and Power Point. I think this is direct response to that competition.
Apple Works remains available for someone who needs the all-around suite.
I think this is a smart move for Apple. They need to compete with that sector, and the better the graphics compatibility, the more the small-office worker will migrate from programs such as MS Publisher to iWork I believe.
If you read through the graphics forum, you will see constant repition of the same question about programs like Publisher which are easier to use vis a vis templates than programs such as Quark or InDesign.
I honestly think that if someone needs a true office suite, those already exist. iWork is aimed toward a different market.
I think a lot of people misunderestimate what a huge market that is - people who need nothing but graphics, word processing, and presentation software. I know that the secretaries in our office never use spreadsheets, only Word and Power Point. I think this is direct response to that competition.
Apple Works remains available for someone who needs the all-around suite.
I think this is a smart move for Apple. They need to compete with that sector, and the better the graphics compatibility, the more the small-office worker will migrate from programs such as MS Publisher to iWork I believe.
If you read through the graphics forum, you will see constant repition of the same question about programs like Publisher which are easier to use vis a vis templates than programs such as Quark or InDesign.
I honestly think that if someone needs a true office suite, those already exist. iWork is aimed toward a different market.
Hi
"These two programs are what iWork is, building a successor to AppleWorks" - Steve Jobs - MacWorld San Francisco 2005 Keynote
The key term there is building. To me, this means that Apple is working on the rest of the "office" aspects, like a spreadsheet and database app, and waiting for a prime time to release it. Apple still sells AppleWorks 6.2.9.
Put simply, don't count your chickens before they hatch. Apple very well could have something up its sleeves yet.
Apple MacBook (Black) 2.16GHz C2D, 4GB, 200GB (7.2K), DL-SD + 16GB iPod touch - http://web.me.com/ctschida - http://www.click2debug.com
"These two programs are what iWork is, building a successor to AppleWorks" - Steve Jobs - MacWorld San Francisco 2005 Keynote
The key term there is building. To me, this means that Apple is working on the rest of the "office" aspects, like a spreadsheet and database app, and waiting for a prime time to release it. Apple still sells AppleWorks 6.2.9.
Put simply, don't count your chickens before they hatch. Apple very well could have something up its sleeves yet.
Apple MacBook (Black) 2.16GHz C2D, 4GB, 200GB (7.2K), DL-SD + 16GB iPod touch - http://web.me.com/ctschida - http://www.click2debug.com
When I first turned on a computer, it was a Windows machine, and it had a program called Microsoft Publisher. I learned to use the computer via this program and after mastering it I then turned to MS Word, which in comparison just plains sucks as a basic page layout, newsletter, invitation, program. The only thing that MS Word does even today is write business letters, give me a page without a curser on it, I will put in my own text boxes.
When I switched to Mac several years ago, I purchased the Adobe suite, which I use, but after growing up on the simplicity of Publisher, I started to miss it, I even bought Virtual PC so that I could load some old files that I created for clients.
I think Pages is the Apple version of Microsoft Publisher, it is not in competition with Word, just filling a void that Microsoft left in the Office Suite for Mac. At least thats what I hope it is, I already ordered my copy of iWork and look forward to a simple page layout program.
When I switched to Mac several years ago, I purchased the Adobe suite, which I use, but after growing up on the simplicity of Publisher, I started to miss it, I even bought Virtual PC so that I could load some old files that I created for clients.
I think Pages is the Apple version of Microsoft Publisher, it is not in competition with Word, just filling a void that Microsoft left in the Office Suite for Mac. At least thats what I hope it is, I already ordered my copy of iWork and look forward to a simple page layout program.
- PCW Network
- MacUser
- Mac OS X Hints
- iPhone Central
- PC World
- PCW Business Center
- About Macworld
- Advertise
- Macworld Expo
- MacMania
- Terms of Service Agreement
- Privacy Policy
© Jive Software


