Quantcast
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
6 Replies Last post: Nov 6, 2005 5:11 PM by Deejemon  
Click to view MW Forums's profile New Member 12,220 posts since
Aug 2, 2004
Reply

Nov 3, 2005 9:40 AM

AOL buys MusicNow, aims for top spot

Looking to boost its presence in the digital music market, America Online Inc. (AOL) has acquired music subscription provider MusicNow from Circuit City Stores Inc., AOL announced Thursday. more
Reply
Click to view powerbrent's profile New Member 162 posts since
Apr 11, 2005
1. Nov 3, 2005 10:38 AM in response to: MW Forums
PC only
It seems that these PC only solutions never get anywhere close to Apple in market share for music. Maybe they should open up to Mac users too?
Click to view Adwiz's profile Member 225 posts since
Aug 27, 2004
2. Nov 3, 2005 10:51 AM in response to: powerbrent
Re: PC only
The problem is that they don't "get it." They are designed by blue-suit types in a boardroom and never really understand how people want their music.

From their terms of service:

"your ability to transfer or make copies ("burns") of Purchased Downloads may vary..." When you purchase individual songs, you don't even have a consistent number of burn allowances that you can depend on!

The Member packages are even worse than other services, because you can't use the memberships to download music into your portable music player. According to their terms of service:

"Members will be able to listen to commercial free online streaming radio stations and play on-demand music offered on the Service ("On-Demand Streams"). Play On-Demand Streams can be accessed on up to three computers but are available for use on one computer per subscriber at a given time. An On-Demand Stream is initiated by selecting a recording while you are on-line, at which time an encrypted file will be transmitted to your computer for a contemporaneous performance of the recording which does not create a download or residual copy or file on your computer other than as temporarily required to render that performance as in the form of a buffer copy."

People get suckered into these membership agreements thinking that they can actually use the music only to find that it's no different from the streaming radio stations you can play for free with the iTunes software.
Click to view fribhey's profile Member 684 posts since
May 21, 2004
3. Nov 3, 2005 11:05 AM in response to: Adwiz
Re: PC only
i also believe that people don't want to have to log into a website to download music to their music player. that's why itunes is so successful, you open up your music player and can purchase music directly from your music player
Click to view macnuke's profile Old Hand 6,659 posts since
Mar 5, 2004
4. Nov 3, 2005 8:07 PM in response to: MW Forums
Re: AOL buys MusicNow, aims for top spot
Napster for AOL is what is sound's like.
all the music you want.. as long as you keep paying.

no thanks.. can't even blame steve case for this one.
i'll just stick to what works best..
iTms
Click to view horvatic's profile New Member 150 posts since
Apr 13, 2005
5. Nov 4, 2005 7:50 AM in response to: MW Forums
Re: AOL buys MusicNow, aims for top spot
No Mac compatability so it isn't going to do any better under AOL than it did on it's own. And having to use Windows media player, Yuck!
Click to view Deejemon's profile New Member 124 posts since
Feb 4, 2004
6. Nov 6, 2005 5:11 PM in response to: powerbrent
Re: PC only
As long as they don't (or can't) support the iPod, and as long as the iPod range is the #1 seller in the world, they'll never compete with iTMS.